The reaction was simple. It was a horrible tragedy of tremendous proportions. When our guys sent their messages back as to what was found when they entered the camps we were appalled. I don't think anyone thought human beings were capable of such atrocities on such a large scale. We were sorry that we had not intervened sooner. The Nuremberg trials brought out even more information that was hard to comprehend, such as 'medical' experiments.
I do not know what you were expecting for an answer but the majority of Americans still feel that way.
___
There's an ambiguity in the question. It's not clear whether it means 'at the time' or afterwards ...
The New York Times published a set of articles about it, there were one or two articles in other papers, but that was about the sum total. They did not want to give the public the impression that they were fighting for the Jews.
___
From late 1942 onwards there were a number of reports in newpapers and magazines but they didn't really 'register'.
Neither the U.S. nor any of the other Allies did anything directly to help those destined for extermination ... None of the Allies was even willing to try to bomb the railways near Auschwitz. The U.S. and its Allies simply didn't want to know the Holocaust and seem to have regarded the issue as a distraction from the war effort. The U.S. and Britain received information already in late 1941 but did not issue a denunciation till 1944. Obviously, the Allies ultimately brought the Holocaust to end by defeating Germany, but that is not the same as targeted or direct intervention.
after we declared war on japan for bombing pearl harbor Germany declared war on us . at first things didn't look to good for uncle sam because we were struggling to get our act together. once we had our act together we kicked their krout asses back to Berlin from many places in Italy and northern Africa and the rest of Europe where they surrendered
America was part of the lend-lease act where the United States had to supply the United Kingdom, China, the Soviet Union, and other Allied nations with war materials between 1941-1945.
During the Holocaust, there was a war going on and immigration to the US was basically halted.
Regular television broadcasting in the US began in 1940, but not that many households had TV sets. TVs became widespread in the US from the late 1940s on. At the time of the Holocaust not many homes had TV.
It is very likely. You could ask a local synagogue tactfully.
The question confuses the Holocaust (the Nazi genoicide of the Jews) with World War 2. The Holocaust took place during World War 2, but the two are not the same. Key allies of the US included: * Britain * The Soviet Union * China * Canada * Australia
No. The United States holds absolutely no responsibility for what happened in the Holocaust. It happened in a different continent, perpetrated by a country far more advanced militarily .
Disgusted, obviously! This is their opposition that is doing these horrid things to their people!
disbelief
The Holocaust was not the fault of the US! It is sometimes said that the US and their Allies did not do much (or anything) to stop the Holocaust. See the related question.
They talk about the holocaust?
The US Constitution was not affected by Holocaust.
Noone cared about the Jews...History is repeating itself today as Israel has become a pariah nation do to hatred
everybody had ice creams and had fish fights
well the Holocaust is important to the worlds history.
no
Nothing specific, the US was fighting a war for most of the time during the Holocaust.
I wonder what you mean by holocaust communities.
The US constitution pre-dated the Holocaust by about 150 years, it did not prevent the Holocaust happening the first time. The Holocaust happened very far away from the USA, whether the US even had a constitution was totally irrelevant.