The Americans thought it was unfair that they could be taxed without having their say in Parliment, such as asking how these taxes were going to be used, and why they were being taxed in the first place. They also thought it was their right to say in Parliment what taxes were unfair to them as British subjects
Since the Colonist didn't like to be taxed by someone who wasn't there, they chose not to pay there taxes. The King of England got mad and sent some soldiers over to America to pay their taxes. One of the soldiersaccidentally shot a colonist and this caused the Boston Massacre. The phrase "No taxation without representation" was the cause for the Boston Massacre.
AnswerI would disregard the above statement regarding the Boston Massacre if I were you.The phrase "Taxation without representation" was the popular description of the taxes imposed on the American colonies. The King with the approval of parliament was authorized to tax the American colonists. The American colonists had no parliamentary representation and therefore had no say in the decision to collect those taxes. The tax that really upset the Americans was the Stamp Act, which required the purchase of stamps which were required for the purchase of many items. The most well known of the items that the stamps were required for was tea. The stamp tax, not the phrase, led to the Boston Tea Party, not the Boston Massacre.
Basically the phrase "Taxation without representation" was coined to describe the situation were colonists, who had no voice in the matter, could be taxed without consenting to it.
Incidentally the taxes represented an effort by the King to pay off the costs incurred by England in the French and Indian War.
Adding to the second answer, colonists (the ones with the money) really did not want a seat in Parliament If the colonies were given representation in Parliament they would easily be outvoted, the taxes would be passed anyway, and their biggest complaint about being taxed would be gone.
Another Answer
This phrase by Owen in came as the result of the way that King George III chose to collect the tax. Instead of using standard tax collection methods established in the colonies, he bid the job of tax collector. He sold the job to the highest bidder. The highest bidder got the job. The tax collector then added his commission onto the official tax. This additional commission led to the 1764 militia revolt in Fayetteville, North Carolina. The governor of North Carolina ended the racket of letting the tax collectors in North Carolina add a commission to their tax collections. That action greatly displeased King George.
Also
I think the main Reason would be Economic from George Washington shooting a French patrol on the future grounds of Pittsburgh's this lead into the French and Indian War, 2 years later the English in Europe got involved in the Seven years War which lead into massive debt, this debt lead into all the taxes on the colonies because the Englishmen were already taxed heavily at this point. Parliament did the smart thing on their part to tax the part that payed the least taxes, sad for them this plan backfired with boycotts ruining Brittan's economy, they took out many acts/taxes to repeal them to save the ecconomy from a further recsssion Colonist wanted all the benefits without paying Taxes leading into violent acts leading into the American Revolution(departure)
James Otis Jr. (1725-1783), a Massachusetts lawyer.
He stated that "taxation without representation is tyranny" during a Boston town meeting in 1765 protesting the Sugar Act (1764).
The American Revolution starting with the revolt against taxation without representation, the colonists staged the Boston tea party. They threw precious tea overboard into Boston harbor causing a riot. This was the beginning of righteous indignation on both sides.
Because most agricultural states like in the south were suffering from enormous taxation and they were losing their representation in the Senate. They knew that if Lincoln was elected they would suffer even more and so they decided they wanted their own government.
The Virginia plan wanted = Large states wanted representation by populationThe New Jersey plan wanted = Small states wanted equal number of representation
Vicarious representation refers to acting that is done on behalf on another person. This may be through actions or feelings of another person.
The colonists of the United States colonies considered British taxation a threat to their freedom. These taxes were put in place for the betterment of Britain, and the colonists felt they would never have economic freedoms.
i'm pretty sure it was "No Taxation Without Representation."
"No Taxation Without Representation!" was the phrase.
They used the slogan "No taxation without representation" against the British as they had nobody to represent them in the British Parliament.
"No taxation without representation."
taxation without representation
Getting taxed without your representation.
Parliament
how to end taxation without representation.
"no taxation without representation" means that they dont want taxes without somebody to speak for them (the colonists)
No taxation without representation.
The stamp act led to the phrase no taxation without representation.
The British colonists in America before the War of Independence (no taxation without representation /in the British Parliament/).