The Kokoda Track Campaign was one of the Australian Army's toughest campaigns of the war. As it was in the tropical environment of Papua, malaria, dysentery, and other tropical diseases were always a risk. An estimated 4,000 soldiers of the Australian Army alone are listed as casualties from illness.
The worst fighting of World War I primarily occurred on the Western Front, particularly in regions like France and Belgium. Notable battles, such as the Battle of the Somme and the Battle of Verdun, resulted in massive casualties and destruction. The trench warfare that characterized this front led to grueling conditions and a stalemate that lasted for years. Ultimately, these battles exemplified the brutality and scale of the conflict.
The wars are not comparable. All had different causes, and were fought under different conditions. However, the Confederates liked to compare themselves with the heroes of the American Revolution, fighting for self-government. And the fighting at Petersburg in 1864-5 did resemble the trench warfare of World War 1.
Fighting conditions for US soldiers on the ground were often extremely challenging due to a combination of factors, including harsh environmental conditions, such as extreme heat or cold, and difficult terrain that hindered movement and visibility. Additionally, the presence of well-entrenched enemy forces utilizing guerrilla tactics made combat unpredictable and dangerous. Limited resources, logistical challenges, and the psychological toll of prolonged engagements further exacerbated the difficulties faced by soldiers in the field.
Conditions for soldiers during the war were often harsh and brutal. They faced extreme weather, inadequate supplies, and poor sanitation, leading to widespread illness and suffering. Combat was intense and traumatic, with many experiencing psychological effects from the violence and loss of comrades. Additionally, soldiers dealt with the constant threat of injury or death, creating a pervasive atmosphere of fear and uncertainty.
Like being in hell. There are NO good conditions in a war, it's all bad, all stupid and vulgar
you suck my toe;)
"i think it is stupid to make dogs fight any way oh ever dose it is a edite" (I'd like to leave this original answer here because it makes me laugh, considering I think the last word is supposed to be idiot.)Fighting dogs are kept in horrible conditions with very little room to run around, they have to work their food and are often severely beaten.
Because people are not happy with what they have and are greedy and want more!
Living conditions. It's not the bullets and shells, it's the living conditions...24/7.
the wold hide in new york
money, and the speech, (these are the times that try men's souls)
When in the UK, British soldiers had a better ration than civilians and better access to medical facilities. They would have been billeted in barracks. When fighting they had better living conditions than the Germans and Russians but not as well as the US forces. Like any front line fighting force they would have had to live in the open in dug-outs during fighting. But when relieved from the front would have been billeted in tents.
Keep fighting for him!
Saying fighting is like saying good luck,
The fighting conditions in Vietnam during the war were harsh and challenging. Soldiers faced dense jungles, extreme weather, and difficult terrain. They also had to deal with guerilla warfare tactics used by the Viet Cong, such as ambushes and booby traps. The war was characterized by intense combat, high casualties, and a lack of clear front lines.
she does not like fighting
because there did not want to be virgen eny more