Probably WWII was more of an economic war than WWI. Japan, for example, went to war almost entirely because the USA, Britain and the Netherlands had frozen the Japanese foreign assets (bank accounts). This meant Japan was unable to buy anything overseas, the most critical need being oil. Germany, led by Hitler in WWII, had only marginal interest in the goals set forth by the Kaiser in WWI, that being an increase in African colonies. These colonies were sought as much as anything for their prestige. Hitler's goal was to expand Germany east so that they would grow stronger economically at the expense of the Slavic peoples. Germany and Japan both had over stimulated (inflation) economies in WWII. Both were on a path economically that led to either war or reduction in military spending. In WWI Germany was very strong economically leading into the war and inflation was not an issue. In both wars money was important but in WWII, Britain did not have the financial resources to fight the war more than a year or so. As such America had to lend vast sums to Britain to keep them in the war. Had the USA not intervened in 1940, Britain would have had to sue for peace by 1941 and the war in Western Europe would have been over. In both wars the USA got involved partially because America wanted more free trade in the world. America's desire was crushed by the English and French in WWI (this probably contributing more than any other single factor to the Great Depression). In WWII, with the French conquered and Britain on American financial life support, they were in no position to hobble the USA. After WWII, the USA began promoting free trade throughout the world, a process that continues to this day. This is the primary reason why the world has had no more depressions, with economic expansion worldwide on a greater scale than at any time in world history.
World War One and Two had some similar and very different situations. Firstly, the wars began for the same reason - German dissatisfaction over land agreements. Additionally, German's attack plan remained generally the same; invade France and take over Western Europe First.
As for changes, military weapons are one of the obvious differences. By 1940 (World War Two) weapons such as gas chambers had been created. This, in turn, lead to a higher casualty rates whilst compared to WW1.
Honestly, someone could go on and on about the vast number of differences. They could compare the leadership, countries on each side, moblilized soldiers, methods of killing, etc.
Answer this question…The iron curtain
world war is war between more then 2 countrys and war is between only 2
Answer this question…Each region fell under the influence of a foreign superpower.
Germany
To convince citizens to participate in a total war
Answer this question… Communism collapsed in the Soviet Union, while it continues to dominate Chinese politics.
The iron curtain
Both were total wars that involved countries' entire populations :)
Answer this question…The iron curtain
What is difference between usage world and subject world?Read more: What_is_difference_between_usage_world_and_subject_world
Plato believed in a world of eternal forms and the superiority of knowledge gained through reason, while Aristotle believed in empirical observation and seeing the physical world as the key to understanding reality.
Science focuses on gaining knowledge about the natural world, whereas technology focuses on creating new products or processes for human use.
Economies in both regions were more internationally connected than ever before. APEX(;
what is the difference between global politics and international politics
well the difference is that an apple is an fruits and the world is what you live in.
a conflict between nationalist and communist movements
AnswerThe difference between the two is that internet is the world wide web and network is local.