guns
No, there have been many civil wars in various countries around the world, but World War 2 was not a civil war.
There is no Civil War II. There is a World War II
If by Civil War you mean the War between the States in the US, then no. If you mean some other civil war, then maybe, you'll need to be more specific.
Because both sides were running out of troops. The war was turning out much longer and bloodier than most people had guessed.
guns
For now, we have very limited proof that the Koren War was bloodier. This is basically because the wars were fought during completely different times. The technological development from Korea to Vietnam was immense. So i would have to say that ultimately the Vietnam war was bloodier than the Korean War for the U.S. We lost more soldiers in Vietnam than any other war and knowing this fact, one can conclude that the Vietnam War was more bloodier.
No, there have been many civil wars in various countries around the world, but World War 2 was not a civil war.
There is no Civil War II. There is a World War II
If by Civil War you mean the War between the States in the US, then no. If you mean some other civil war, then maybe, you'll need to be more specific.
World War I was originally called "The Great War" (not the Civil War)
Because both sides were running out of troops. The war was turning out much longer and bloodier than most people had guessed.
no. there were several years of peace between the civil war and world war1
Before world war 2, Spain was involved in a civil war.
Yes, world at war a lot more bloodier, you can blow off limbs in world at war and the Japanese were very brutal soldiers.
The US civil War began in 1861 and the Korean War began in 1950 and the War of 1812 began in 1812. So it goes from left to right War of 1812, US Civil War, Korean War
No.