Sounds like U.S. Grant. A heavy drinker certainly. Butcher - yes, he appeared to be blase about his losses, but it was simply a war of attrition, and he knew the Confederates would run out of men first.
British soldiers had mixed feelings about Sir Douglas Haig, the commander of British forces during World War I. Some viewed him as a competent leader who made strategic decisions under difficult circumstances, while others criticized him for his tactics, particularly during the Somme and Passchendaele campaigns, which resulted in heavy casualties. Many soldiers felt that his strategies were outdated and led to unnecessary loss of life, fostering a perception of him as a "butcher." Overall, opinions on Haig varied widely depending on personal experiences and the outcomes of specific battles.
Field Marshall Haig was also considered a good leader rather than being a butcher because of two reasons. Firstly, he knew what he had to do to save the country, he sacrificed the lives of the soldiers to protect the other thousand lives in Britain. This is shown when Field Marshall Haig says, " losses are bound to be heavy on both sides, for in the price of victory is paid." Moreover, this is portrayed when Field Marshall Haig encourages his men when he says, " no superiority of arms and ammunition however great will enable victories to be won without sacrifice of men's lives." Secondly, the methods he used in the war were very wise and in line with that period of time. Other than that he was a total butcher because he sent thousands to their deaths and spoke about it like if it was no big deal, in my opinion he was not a great leader.
Firstly because it was considered cool and secondly they were very heavy, so it was easier to put the weight on your shoulder rather than having your arm ache.
they also were the target of heavy destruction by the Allied forces
Sounds like U.S. Grant. A heavy drinker certainly. Butcher - yes, he appeared to be blase about his losses, but it was simply a war of attrition, and he knew the Confederates would run out of men first.
A heavy drinker is sometimes called a sot.
no
His father was a heavy drinker. which lead to liver proplems and death finally.
5
No. Obama never was a heavy drinker.
yes he did drink he was a heavy drinker
Blacking out
Yes Christiano Ronaldo was heavy drinker. A complete Alcholic.
It is unlikely, although he was known to be a relatively heavy drinker.
Sounds like a heavy drinker who doesn't remember anything for several days!
An alcohol abuser, or alcoholic, depending on the circumstances. A posh word is 'dipsomaniac'.