Best Answer

He has never been proved more abundantly right for he gave us six months of peace in which Channon rearmed, and he was right to try appeasement.

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar


Lvl 1
4y ago


This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar


Lvl 1
4y ago


This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did Channon claim appeasement was the right policy?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about Military History

What was the policy of appeasement and did it work?

There are many reasons which do justify appeasement and also many reasons that don't justify appeasement. Firstly, appeasement was justified because many military experts in Britain calculated that there would be over 1 million deaths in the first 60 days of war if war broke out in September 1938. This meant that many people wanted to have a negotiated peace because Britain was not ready for war. Furthermore, appeasement was justified because Britain wanted to play for time so she could rearm and massively increase the number of men in the army (through conscription) and the number of RAF planes. This also links to the calculations made by the military experts as Britain knew that if they did not rearm then many civilians would die in air raids. Instead, politicians knew that buying time would decrease that risk. However, appeasement was not justified because only 7% of the British population believed that Hitler would not demand to take over any other European countries. This meant that 93% of the population thought Hitler would take land that was not rightfully German which would inevitably result in war. Furthermore, appeasement was not justified because giving in to Hitler's demands at the Munich Conference meant that Hitler would have more confidence and perhaps take a gamble to demand more land in the future. This also links to the fact that Germany would become much stronger through appeasement which would make it much harder to defeat a stronger Germany in the future. In my overall opinion, I don't think appeasement was justified because it gave Hitler the confidence to demand more land. This was evident when Hitler demanded the Polish Corridor and Danzig in August 1939, which eventually resulted in war. The public opinion in Britain also was a reason to abandon appeasement because many thought Hitler would demand further, which did happen, and this links to the point I said about Hitler growing more confident and stronger. However, the possible death toll in the first 60 days of a war was incredibly high if Britain did not play for time and rearm.

What was the failure of appeasement?

German leaders could not be trusted to honor agreements with other countries.

What is a moral claim?

A moral claim simply means that one calls an action moral or right and grants it a special status. The basis of a moral claim is frequently religious but can also reflect social mores, personal approval, or utilitarian objectives.

My brother who recently passed stated i was on his life insurance How can you find out if i am a beneficiary on a life insurance policy with the military in the state of Texas?

If you were on his life insurance policy and he was military, they will be contacting you. No worries. You would simply contact the SGLI claims department and file a claim, or at the least find out who is in fact a beneficiary. Try this link for a link to VA Affairs and a phone number. They will point you in the right direction.,15356,165322,00.html

Why did Philippines have the right to claim Marianas island?

lahat ng Islands sa Philippines. khit Antartica sa Philippines. paksyet.

Related questions

Why did Halifax claim appeasement was the right policy?

it found a country and commonwealth wholly united within itself, and that no alternative remained.

Was appeasement the right policy in England in 1938?

The UK government had no choice but to offer appeasement in 1938 because its Armed Forces were so small there was nothing that they could do against Germany who had been preparing for war since 1933.

What After reading Documents C D and E create a hypothesis to answer to question Was appeasement the right policy for England in 1938 Cite evidence from the documents to support your answer?

i dont know

Can bankruptcy court get the proceeds of a life insurance policy?

The Bankruptcy Court has every right to claim the proceeds of a life insurance policy once you are declared by them as insolvent.

Does your ex husband have the right to claim on an insurance policy if child died in car accident child an adult?

if he's not on the policy as a beneficiery he can't. ADDED: It makes no difference if the child is an adult or a minor. If the policy is up-to-date (i.e.: all premiums paid and current) and your ex-husband is a named beneficiary on the policy then he does have beneficiary rights. It's as simple as that. On the other hand, if he was NOT specifically named on the policy, he has no claim whatsoever.

How would Neville Chamberlain have defended the policy of appeasement?

It was an attempt to avoid war. Nobody wanted to go through all of that death and destruction, yet when an enemy is intent on destroying you, you must fight. In the case of Germany, they were intent on ruling all of Europe and eventually the world. No amount of appeasement would have deterred Hitler. He believed it to be the Aryan right. It's a lesson we should have learned. No amount of appeasement will deter radical Islam. They too are intent on ruling the world.

How did the allies know appeasement failed?

Appeasement was a controversial strategy right out of the gate. Hitler and his German war machine had already broken a number of conventions. Ultimately what defeated the appeasement proposal was the obstinance of Winston Churchill. What deemed it a failure was the invasion of Poland.

How long after an accident do you have to file a claim through state farm?

Any insurance carrier requires to notify of a claim, or potential claim as soon a it happens. If it is a few days past, it is usually no big deal. There will be a reporting claim clause in your policy. It there is personal injury-it should be called in right away.

Mother gives 4 sons her home she pays insurance premiums in her name years later a claim is made who legally has claim to the insurance proceeds mother or sons insurance was never changed to the sonns?

The legal right to the money requested in the claim goes to the person who is named in the policy. Regardless of who was paying the premiums.... (even if the sons made the claim to fix something) Mom has her name on it she will be named on the check and will be the rightful recipient to the claim.

Will the insurance going to take your claim after you reactive your account right after the accident?

No yhe policy must be in effect at the time of the loss event. Thank you so much

What are the reasons for claim rejection?

A claim can be rejected in any of the following situations- 1.Insurer can reject the claim if the policyholder has some pre-existing disease which was not disclosed during the policy term. If the claim is made on that ailment, it can be rejected. 2. Insurance company may also deny claims if documents submitted by the insured are incomplete. 3. As per health policy terms & conditions, an insured should inform the insurance company within 48 hours of hospitalization. Any failure to abide by deadline would result into claim rejection. 4. Insurance company has a right to reject the claim if the pre-authorization form is not carefully filled or if there is a discrepancy in the information, like incorrect postal address, policy number, etc. 5. Claims may be denied if it is for those ailments which are not covered in the policy.

What are your rights to prevent your car insurance from settling with the other side if you honestly feel this is a fraud case?

Typically, an insurance policy gives the insurance company the right to settle any claim at its sole discretion. So, you may have no right to oppose the insurance company's decision to settle! But read your policy to find out for sure.