0
What else can I help you with?
Why do you think that machine- gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than footsoldiers if they were captured?
They kill more soldiers
Why do you think that machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy then footsoldiers if they were captured?
Machine-gunner crews were often more vulnerable to enemy fire and capture because they typically operated heavy weaponry that was critical to their unit's defensive and offensive capabilities, making them high-value targets. When captured, their role in inflicting casualties on the enemy could lead to a harsher response, as they were seen as more directly responsible for enemy losses. Additionally, the nature of their position often left them less mobile and more exposed during combat, increasing their likelihood of being killed if captured rather than simply taken prisoner like foot soldiers.
Why do you think that machine gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than footsoliders if they were captured?
Machine gunner crews were often seen as high-value targets by the enemy due to their significant role in providing suppressive fire and shaping the battlefield. If captured, their expertise and the strategic advantage they provided made them more likely to be executed or treated harshly to deter others from taking up similar roles. Additionally, foot soldiers typically operated in larger groups, making it easier for them to blend in and potentially escape, whereas machine gunners were more isolated and vulnerable when deployed.
Why do you think machine gun crews were likely to be killed by the enemy foot soldiers if they were captured?
Machine gun crews were likely to be killed by enemy foot soldiers if captured due to the strategic threat they posed on the battlefield. Machine guns could inflict significant casualties and disrupt enemy advances, making their operators prime targets. Capturing such crews could also demoralize the opposing forces, but allowing them to live could risk them being used for intelligence or retribution. Consequently, enemy soldiers might feel compelled to eliminate this threat permanently.
Were the soldiers who captured and killed osama bin laden in turn killed?
Several US Seals were killed, but most survived, during the execution of Osama.
Why do you think that machine- gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than footsoldiers if they were captured?
They kill more soldiers
Why were the machine-gunner crew more likely to be killed by the enemy than the footsoldier if they were captured?
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
Why were the machine gunner crew more likely to be killed by the enemy than the footsoldier if they were captured?
I think that the machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than foot soldiers, if they were captured because of the simple fact that they thought they should bring it among themselves to kill them instead of capturing them because that would be even harder.
Why do you think that machine-gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy then footsoldiers if they were captured?
Machine-gunner crews were often more vulnerable to enemy fire and capture because they typically operated heavy weaponry that was critical to their unit's defensive and offensive capabilities, making them high-value targets. When captured, their role in inflicting casualties on the enemy could lead to a harsher response, as they were seen as more directly responsible for enemy losses. Additionally, the nature of their position often left them less mobile and more exposed during combat, increasing their likelihood of being killed if captured rather than simply taken prisoner like foot soldiers.
Why do you think that machine gunner crews were more likely to be killed by the enemy than footsoliders if they were captured?
Machine gunner crews were often seen as high-value targets by the enemy due to their significant role in providing suppressive fire and shaping the battlefield. If captured, their expertise and the strategic advantage they provided made them more likely to be executed or treated harshly to deter others from taking up similar roles. Additionally, foot soldiers typically operated in larger groups, making it easier for them to blend in and potentially escape, whereas machine gunners were more isolated and vulnerable when deployed.
Why do you think machine gun crews were likely to be killed by the enemy foot soldiers if they were captured?
Machine gun crews were likely to be killed by enemy foot soldiers if captured due to the strategic threat they posed on the battlefield. Machine guns could inflict significant casualties and disrupt enemy advances, making their operators prime targets. Capturing such crews could also demoralize the opposing forces, but allowing them to live could risk them being used for intelligence or retribution. Consequently, enemy soldiers might feel compelled to eliminate this threat permanently.
How many french soldiers died at the battle of jumonville glen?
reports vary, most soldiers were captured or killed
How much miners was captured in the erueka stockade?
6 soldiers were killed and 22 miners were killed. 12 miners were injured.
Were the soldiers who captured and killed osama bin laden in turn killed?
Several US Seals were killed, but most survived, during the execution of Osama.
How many American soldiers died in Somalia?
18 Killed 91 wounded 1 captured
How many british soldiers died in battle of Trenton?
120 were killed and wounded 1000 were captured
How many Romania people were killed in ww1?
Approx. 500 000 soldiers dead, wounded, missing or captured.
