They believed that this increased the difficulty of rational peacetime settlements even more difficult because anything could be a target in total war, from food to vehicles. "If it belongs to the enemy we will destroy it" is the idea of total war. Because of this idea it is much more difficult to create a rational peacetime settlement than did earlier types of warfare.
Flip a coin. Both explanations have been offered. I suspect that elements of both explanations factored in to his actions.
He was trying to start an armed rebellion of slaves - which most slaves certainly didn't want. It made the South believe that the fast-growing Abolitionist movement wanted to see a nationwide rebellion of this sort. This put the whole slavery issue beyond rational debate, and many have called these the first shots of the Civil War.
There is not such a race. It is a designation of a hypothetical language of the Indo-European family. Therefore an Aryan is a person who purportedly descended from prehistoric people who spoke the language. The Nazis used it to designate someone who was not of Jewish descent. This is the reason that hate groups such as the White Supremacist refer to a "pure Aryan" race. Their misunderstanding of the issue is not surprising when one considers the absence of rational(not to mention normal) mentality of the persons involved in such despicable organizations.
Realism theory in international relations posits that war is an inevitable outcome of the anarchic nature of the international system, where states prioritize their own survival and interests. Realists argue that power dynamics and competition among states drive conflicts, as each state seeks to maximize its security and influence. Consequently, war is seen as a rational response to the threat posed by other states, reflecting the inherent uncertainty and distrust in international politics.
Mutually assured destruction (MAD) is a military strategy and framework of deterrence which posits that if two opposing sides possess the capability to inflict unacceptable damage on each other through nuclear weapons, neither will initiate conflict for fear of total annihilation. This doctrine suggests that the sheer threat of catastrophic retaliation prevents either side from launching a first strike. Therefore, MAD relies on the assumption that rational actors will prioritize survival over aggression.
Rational. All the counting numbers (and their negatives) are rational. So all integers are rational. Rational means a number which can be expressed by an integer divided by any other nonzero integer. ("Rational", from "ratio"). In the decimal system some might be difficult to write down exactly (like 1/3, or 1/7), but that difficulty doesn't stop them being rational.
Do you have a specific example? Try to simplify and eliminate the denominators.
There is no simple method. If you can write the number as a ratio of two integers, in the form p/q where q>0, then the number is rational. But it is often very difficult to show that such a representation is not possible.
That would be a difficult justification. 2.010010001 is a rational number. Specifically, it's the ratio of 2,010,010,001 to 1,000,000,000 .
Rational
1.14 is rational.
4.6 is rational.
No, it is rational.
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
It is a rational number
No, it is rational.
Rational.