Because the South wanted slavery but in the North didn't want slavery.
Chat with our AI personalities
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
the state of tension between nations without armed conflict was know by having the handbook. the intentional relation was founded lately during 2001 for all of the countries out there
Hitler intended to cut the sea lines between the US and Europe by having an armada of ships block the shipping channels. Hitler tried everything possible to cut the sea lines.
The US had 6 different classes of DEs, all slightly different. The DE was a fairly small ship, having a length of between ABOUT 280-300 ft.
The economy of the South was based primarily on cotton monoculture supported by slave labor. Their cotton was sold to Europe for hard currency (and some to northern factories as well.) Southern farmers, especially plantation owners growing cotton, were in favor of slavery AND low tariffs on imported goods. The North's economy was far more diverse, having a mix of factories, agriculture primarily based on grains, shipbuilding, and transportation. Their manufacturing interests were protected from foreign competition by high tariffs on imported goods. This made the North against slavery, which they felt gave the South an advantage in agriculture costs, AND high tariffs, which protected the factories of North from cheap, and frankly better made products from Europe. This disparity made conflict inevitable and prompted crises in 1820, 1830, 1850 and finally secession in December of 1860.