Fighting a war on two fronts splits up your military. You have a whole country between your two main forces, and you would need twice the number of supply lines. This weakened Germany in both World War I and World War II. The double front made leadership much harder, and where combined forces could have held off Allied assaults the smaller forces could not.
Germany was fighting on two fronts in WW1 because of a complex system of alliances. When Bosnian Serb terrorists succeeded in their assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, Austria-Hungary made demands of Serbia that Serbia could not acquiesce to as an independent nation. Serbia was allied with Russia, so that, when Austria-Hungary commenced hostilities against the Serbians, the Russians declared war against Austria-Hungary. Germany was allied to Austria-Hungary, so they joined the Austrians against the Russians. The Russians were allied to France and Britain, so Great Britain declared war on Germany. Then, a plethora of smaller nations, tied to alliances, began declaring war on the main participants and also on each other. Germany did not want to fight on two fronts, but it followed its treaties like all the other players in WW1.
He had no choice, he was opposed on two fronts.
Picture a box with four sides. Fighting on 1 side is one front. Fighting on two sides of the box is fighting on two fronts. Three sides of the box is 3 fronts, four sides of the box (surrounded) is fighting on four fronts. Two or more fronts is a multi front war.
Russia was defeated by Germany. Although this allowed Germany to shift forces to the Western front in France; Germany's allies: Austria-Hungary & Turkey were fighting on other fronts (Balkans & Middle East).
Well, World War One was a deadly war. That's one disadvantage. At the end of the War, Germany had to pay war reparations, approximately $33 Billion!well world war one had a big part in russia and franceB.It had to fight against enemies on both sides of Germany.
That was one of the reasons for Germany's loss of WW 2.
Germany hato separate their troops to fight the soviet union tne great Britain wneh they attack back
Germany in WW2 had many fronts but i think what you are asking that in Europe since 1941 was fighting the Soviet Union, in 1944 the allied forces landed in Normandy, France which forced Nazi Germany to fight on both fronts but Germany was also fighting in North Africa and Italy until the Normandy landings.
Liberators Fighting on Two Fronts in World War II - 1992 TV was released on: USA: 11 November 1992
American soldiers were fighting on the European front against Germany (this front often includes those fighting in Africa) and the Pacific front against Japan.
On the western and eastern fronts
Fighting on two fronts: The Germans and the Japanese.
Picture a box with four sides. Fighting on 1 side is one front. Fighting on two sides of the box is fighting on two fronts. Three sides of the box is 3 fronts, four sides of the box (surrounded) is fighting on four fronts. Two or more fronts is a multi front war.
Germany was attempting to avoid a war on two fronts.
Germany was fighting England from 1939 to 1945.
He was Chancellor of Germany, which meant overseeing all aspects of his Nazi government, the German public, and the multiple fronts the Wehrmacht (German Army) was fighting on.
Germany
Russia was defeated by Germany. Although this allowed Germany to shift forces to the Western front in France; Germany's allies: Austria-Hungary & Turkey were fighting on other fronts (Balkans & Middle East).
Well, World War One was a deadly war. That's one disadvantage. At the end of the War, Germany had to pay war reparations, approximately $33 Billion!well world war one had a big part in russia and franceB.It had to fight against enemies on both sides of Germany.