They didn't. They used each other. Stalin had long term plans to have Hitler eliminate the intelligentsia of Europe as he had done in Russia.
Hitler approved of all the methods of Russian genocide that had been going on for years and actually sent people to Russia to learn how to build concentration camps. Hitler's demands of absolute merciless cruelty from his officers actually came from the example of Stalin. This similitude would have resulted in a simmering resentment in Hitler and a feeling of inferiority.
Publicly admiring the Russians was bad for Hitler's political aspirations as well so he chose to reverse any good things he'd been saying them. The Ribbentrop Pact had been a ruse to get supplies while holding the Russians at bay so that he could concentrate on other activities. The Russians welcomed this because they had only recently finalized their war with Finland (and lost) and the Japanese on the Manchurian border, (and won).
Chat with our AI personalities
great Britain and its eroupean allies such as fance. and others not noted
The lower classes of wealth ussually supported Stalin. Other than that, it was ussually based on personal opinion (unless there was another significant factor, such as you bolonged to a group targeted by Stalin).
With Hitler he was a socialist. He had nothing in common with Stalin.
Stalin had a bad childhood not bad as Hitler though
Stalin did not needed Hitler for help. They were not allies during World War II. They became enemies after Hitler violated a non-aggression pact. Yes, with the exception of the division of Poland and the Soviet occupation of the Baltic states there was nothing in common between the two. The non aggression pact was used by Hitler to secure his eastern frontier prior to launching Barbarossa in the summer of 1941.