No, members of Congress are immune from suits against them for anything they say on the floor of Congress. Article I, Section 6 Clause 1 states: ". . . and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place." This grants them immunity from suits for anything they say in Congress.
No
answer 2 In many countries, the activities of the parliament or high government are published as a record. Whether the government may be sued for its published proceedings or not may depend on the laws of the country. Generally not.
Similarly for courts in many jurisdictions. The purpose of a court hearing is to establish the truth, and consequently anything that may inhibit that function; such as being dissuaded from speaking because of threat of slander; could be seen as hindrance. Once again it depends on the laws of the country.
And in our minds, we may only be thinking of advanced democracies.
So "it all depends".
I believe the people can . that's called a
No
In the Senate, after the end of the session of March 19,1856, by the the honourable Preston Brooks, as retaliation to the violent speech addressed by Sumner against Brooks uncle, the old South Carolina's Senator Andrew Butler. Indeed the verbal attack was aimed to censor the whole South, because of their politics about Kansas, of which Butler had only been chosen as a random target.
The Sumner-Brook Affair was an incident that took place in the senate, where Charles Sumner delivered a very ugly speech insulting a very high esteemed Senator of South Carolina, Andrew Butler. Butler suffered from a physical defect that made him drool. Sumner made a connection of Butler's slobbering in connection with the Barbarity of slave owners. Later on Preston Brooks, Butler's cousin, snuck up behind Sumner and beat him with a cane till it broke. The South viewed Brooks as a hero and the North forgot Sumner's wrongdoings and praised him
Charles Sumner bad mouthed Butler during a speech and then got beaten retarded by Butlers nephew Preston BrooksIMPROVED ANSWER:Because of the violence in Kansas over the issue of slavery, it eventually reached the nation's capital.Violence in urban Washington, DC, matched the violence in frontier Kansas.When Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts denounced "the crime against Kansas" in a widely publicized speech, a member of Congress from South Carolina, Preston Brooks, attacked him on the Senate floor and beat him senseless with a cane.Sumner was hospitalized and his seat remained empty for two years, a mute reminder of the scene.
killing people
Lincoln was not elected to the Senate after the Lincoln-Douglas debate in 1858. US Senators were still elected by state legislatures. The Republicans won a slender majority in popular vote, but the malapportioned Illinois state-senate seats resulted in a majority for Stephen Douglas. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were widely reprinted throughout the country, and Lincoln gained invitations for speaking engagements. Major speeches like the 1859 Cooper Union speech set the groundwork for his presidential run in 1860.
No
Slander. SLANDER.
Slander
No, the first amendment only gives the freedom of speech, press, and religion. Although, speech that harms someones reputation is slander, which is a crime. Slander is a crime and freedom of speech is a right.
slander
Senator Jackson's incendiary speech angered the crowd.
Under the two-speech rule no senator may speak more than twice in a given question in the same legislative day. By recessing- temporarily interrupting- rather than adjourning a day's session, the senate can prolong a "legislative day" indefinitely. Thus, the two-speech rule can successfully limit the amount of time the Senate spends on some matters on its agenda. from my government book
Under the two-speech rule no senator may speak more than twice in a given question in the same legislative day. By recessing- temporarily interrupting- rather than adjourning a day's session, the senate can prolong a "legislative day" indefinitely. Thus, the two-speech rule can successfully limit the amount of time the Senate spends on some matters on its agenda. from my government book
slander or libel
Slander
Slander or defamation.
Oral defamatory speech is called slander. It occurs when false and damaging statements are spoken or conveyed verbally to a third party, causing harm to the reputation of an individual or entity.