answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

no, it was "Separate but equal". so there was still segregation.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did homer plessy desegrate trains in Louisiana?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Where do homer plessy live?

he live in new Orleans Louisiana


What percentage of black was Homer Plessy?

Homer Plessy was 1/8 (.123%) black.


Who brought a case to the Supreme Court based on his arrest for riding in a whites-only railroad car in Louisiana?

Homer Plessy


Where did Homer Plessy live?

Homer Plessy was classified as an "Octoroon" by 19th-Century New Orleans standards, meaning he was one-eighth African in descent. Plessy had one black grandmother, a Haitian "free woman of color," named Catherine Mathieu, who married and bore eight children with Homer's French Caucasian grandfather, Germain Plessy. Homer was very light-skinned, and said his African heritage was "not discernable."Plessy belonged to a group of New Orleans' African-American professionals, the Citizens Committee, that deliberately staged confrontations over Jim Crow laws in Louisianna. The law targeted in this case was Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890, which required separation of travelers by race. If Plessy's arrest hadn't been prearranged with the East Louisiana Railroad Company, he probably wouldn't have been challenged for sitting in the "whites only" car.You can access a photo of Homer Plessy via Related Links, below.


Did Homer Plessy have a family?

No.


What did Homer Plessy look like?

Homer Plessy was classified as an "Octoroon" by 19th-Century New Orleans standards, meaning he was one-eighth African in descent. Plessy had one black grandmother, a Haitian "free woman of color," named Catherine Mathieu, who married and bore eight children with Homer's French Caucasian grandfather, Germain Plessy. Homer was very light-skinned, and said his African heritage was "not discernable."Plessy belonged to a group of New Orleans' African-American professionals, the Citizens Committee, that deliberately staged confrontations over Jim Crow laws in Louisianna. The law targeted in this case was Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890, which required separation of travelers by race. If Plessy's arrest hadn't been prearranged with the East Louisiana Railroad Company, he probably wouldn't have been challenged for sitting in the "whites only" car.You can access a photo of Homer Plessy via Related Links, below.


Did Homer Plessy have any disabilities?

No, it appears Homer Plessy was intelligent, healthy and strong. Nothing in the literature suggests otherwise.


When was plessy born?

Homer Plessy was born March 17, 1863.


Why did Homer Plessy get arrested?

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)Homer Plessy was arrested on June 7, 1892, for sitting in a whites-only railroad car, in violation of restrictions set by Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890. The East Louisiana Railroad Company, which also wanted the Separate Car Act repealed, conspired with the (New Orlean's) Citizens' Committee, a civil rights activist group comprised primarily of African-American professionals, and Plessy to arrange Plessy's arrest so he would have standing to challenge the law in court.


Who were the lawyers in Plessy v. Ferguson?

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)For the Petitioner: Homer PlessyAlbion W. Tourgée and Samuel F. Phillips argued the Plessy's case before the Court.James C. Walker, a Louisiana attorney, represented Homer Plessy as local counsel, along with famed New York civil rights attorney and former judge Albion Tourgée. Walker and Tourgée submitted a brief to the US Supreme Court on Plessy's behalf, as did law partners Samuel F. Phillips and F. D. McKenney.For the Respondent: John FergusonM. J. Cunningham, Louisiana Attorney General


What is the dates of Homer plessy accomplishments?

1926


Why did Homer Plessy challenge a Louisiana law in 1892?

In 1892 Homer Plessy rode in a whites only railroad car. He was brought before the courts and argued that the lawwas unconstitutional. In 1896 the supreme court expressed a new legal document endorsing "seperate, but equal."