answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, the railroad holding company's (Northern Securities Co) stock transactions were in restraint of interstate commerce,and came within guidelines of the Sherman Anti Trust Act. The Northern Securities Co vs The United States in which the Supreme Court found in favor of the government was a vindication of Roosevelt's actions. This case also rejuvenated the Sherman Anti Trust Act.- tuffy

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do you agree with Roosevelt's use of the sherman antitrust act against northern securities?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

The first time that the US government succeeded in using the Act against big business was when the Supreme Court ordered the break up of the Northern Securities Company a railroad holdin?

sherman antitrust act


What was the outcome of Theodore Roosevelt case against northern securities?

Roosevelt argued that northern securities used unfair business pratices in violation of the sherman act


In early 1902 Roosevelt ordered his attorney general to file a lawsuit under the sherman antitrust act against?

the Northern Securities because they alarmed the Americans and Roosevelt. The stock battle that led to its creation seemed a classic example of private interests acting in a way that threatened the nation as a whole. Roosevelt decided that the company was in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.


What did Roosevelt do about the 1902 coal strike?

Roosevelt ordered his attorney to finn a law suite against northern securities.


The sherman antitrust law was used as a weapon against labor unions?

True. The sherman Antitrust law was against labor unions.


Protects investors against fraud in the buying and selling of securities?

The SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission)


What is a loan against securities?

Loan against securities is a loan that a customer can avail by pledging his or her investments in favour of the lender. This loan can be availed without selling your investments.


What action did US President Teddy Roosevelt take on the Northern security Case?

In 1902, Roosevelt ordered the Attorney General to bring a law suit against the Northern Securities Company. Roosevelt believed that the company was violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.


Who vigorously prosecuted the Sherman Antitrust Law?

President Theodore Roosevelt was very aggressive to enforce the Sherman Antitrust Law passed in 1890. President Roosevelt filed suite against forty-five companies under the Sherman Antitrust Act.


Did Teddy Roosevelt like trusts?

The Northern Securities Company was formed in 1902 by railroad interests to continue their monopoly on rail commerce. The company was sued in 1902 under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 by President Theodore Roosevelt, one of the first anti-trust cases filed against corporate interests. In 1904, the US Supreme Court confirmed the ruling inNorthern Securities Co. v. United States, and the trust was dissolved.


Do I have to borrow against my securities?

Borrowing against your securities can be a low-cost method to borrow money. No deduction is permitted for that interest unless of course the borrowed funds can be used for investment or business reasons.


Why was Teddy Roosevelt was known as a trust buster?

Beginning in 1902, President Theodore Roosevelt's adminstration used the federal courts and the Sherman Antitrust Act (1890) to break up "trusts" (cartels, monopolies) that Roosevelt believed were acting against the interests of the people and the country. Up until that time, the "restraint of trade" facet of the Act was used against labor unions. The first success was against J.P. Morgan's Northern Securities Company, which monopolized rail freight traffic in the US by its anti-competitive practices. There were other trusts that Roosevelt saw as primarily benefitting a few wealthy directors at the expense of the economy, and he moved against them as well. He soon became known as the "Trust Buster" although he thought some monopolies were in the public interest, and opposed their breakup. (This was one thing that led to his decision in 1912 to run for President again against his successor, William Howard Taft.)