It spurred the economy, because immigrants were willing to work for little wages. It also spurred the economy because now there were more consumers to buy the goods.
The transportation revolution was more important in the North than in the South primarily due to the North's industrial economy, which relied heavily on efficient transportation networks for moving goods and raw materials. The development of railroads, canals, and improved roads facilitated faster and cheaper movement of products, supporting urban growth and manufacturing. In contrast, the South's economy was predominantly agrarian, focusing on cash crops like cotton, which required less extensive transportation infrastructure. Consequently, the South didn't experience the same level of transformative impact from transportation improvements as the North did.
The north had an industrial based economy. The south had an agricultural based economy.
what were two key differences between the north's economy and the south's economy?
The South experienced fewer transportation innovations compared to the North primarily due to its reliance on agriculture and the plantation economy, which prioritized the movement of goods over the development of extensive transportation infrastructure. Additionally, the South's economic resources were concentrated in land and slave labor rather than industrial development, limiting investment in transportation. In contrast, the North's industrialization spurred innovations in railroads and canals, facilitating trade and movement of goods and people. This economic divergence created a significant gap in transportation advancements between the two regions.
It was not as accepted in the north, and was not as important in the economy, as for the south, without slavery there economy would fail.
by eating them.
The transportation revolution was more important in the North than in the South primarily due to the North's industrial economy, which relied heavily on efficient transportation networks for moving goods and raw materials. The development of railroads, canals, and improved roads facilitated faster and cheaper movement of products, supporting urban growth and manufacturing. In contrast, the South's economy was predominantly agrarian, focusing on cash crops like cotton, which required less extensive transportation infrastructure. Consequently, the South didn't experience the same level of transformative impact from transportation improvements as the North did.
The economy of the North in the United States before the Civil War was dominated by manufacturing, trade, and industry. The region benefited from advancements in technology, transportation infrastructure, and a growing urban population. The North had a more diversified economy compared to the agrarian-based economy of the South.
The Civil War greatly improved the economy of the North but harmed the economy of the South.
Well if horses were never used for transport then in the oldern days people would have a hard time getting to their destination.
How slavery would affect the economy
just a little because some northerners had slaves too
The North had virtually all the deposits of iron ore in the United States. This helped the North develop an industrial economy based on steel and manufacturing.
North Korea has a command economy.
the economy of north Dakota is 9,638,676
The government of North Korea is mostly closed to the outside world. This makes for a pretty stagnant economy. The government of South Korea is more open, and has a more vibrant economy.
North Korea does not have a mixed economy. It has a command economy or centrally planned economy because the government controls everything in north Korea.