Affirmative action, otherwise known as "reverse-discrimination", is a policy that effectively discriminates against certain groups for the benefit of other groups. The intent of such a policy is to "even the playing field." The actual result, however, is that less qualified individuals unfairly gain access to employment, education, groups, etc at the expense of more qualified individuals. But this does not even begin to address the true underpinnings of discrimination. The result of affirmative action, or discrimination, is that those in the "target" groups that affirmative action is supposed to help might obtain credentials that are then questioned (fairly or unfairly) but others who wonder if their success was a product of talent and hard-work or of government-sponsorsored discrimination - ie affirmative action. So, the result is that affirmative action actually LEADS to stereotyping, the underpinning of discrimination. Affirmative Action should absolutely be eliminated. Fairness is not unilateral - the only way to address problems of discrimination is by even-ing the playing field for all. Education and free markets are the solution.
Any automatic unthinking affirmative action should be abolished. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that any person who is a member of a group that has been systematically denied employment rights can be provided regress through affirmative action. Such groups that no longer exist should not receive affirmative action.
If any groups exist where individuals are being denied jobs or entrance to schools based on membership in that group, then such persons may be eligible for affirmative action.
Critics often make the argument that affirmative action is unconstitutional.
reverse discrimination
5
nixon
supreme court jsut a guess
Affirmative action is about farming
Eliminating affirmative action could result in a less diverse and inclusive workforce or educational environment. It may limit opportunities for underrepresented groups and perpetuate existing inequalities. Additionally, companies and institutions may struggle to address systemic discrimination without affirmative action policies in place.
what employer are subject to affirmative action
No affirmative action is morally defensible.
Chinese for Affirmative Action was created in 1969.
Affirmative action was put into place so people of varying difference could not be rejected for a discrimination purpose. Some people believe that affirmative action is a harm because people less qualified will be given a job because of race or sexual preference, when this happens affirmative action should be removed.
Affirmative Action
No, Arizona does not have affirmative action policies in place. In fact, the state passed a ballot measure in 2010 that prohibited affirmative action in areas such as college admissions and hiring practices.
Affirmative Action Around the World was created in 2004.
Democratic views on affirmative action vary, but most Democrats support it as a means to promote equality and diversity. They believe that affirmative action is necessary to address historical disadvantages faced by marginalized groups, and it helps to create a more inclusive and equitable society. Democrats generally argue that affirmative action policies should be implemented to ensure equal opportunities in education, employment, and other areas.
The question is unclear. Affirmative action is aimed at compensating for the perceived disadvantages of one group. African-Americans are traditionally the beneficiaries of Affirmative action.
Affirmative Action Around the World has 239 pages.