protectors
It Protectors
Some whites in the South justified slavery on the basis of religion (using biblical passages such as the so-called "curse of Ham" or the passage in Philemon where Paul seemingly supports slavery) to say "God has put whites in power over blacks; therefore, slavery is OK." Others justified slavery for economic reasons: "It's cheap to use slaves' free labor; the economy will collapse if we have to pay them." Others used fallacious scientific reasons (such as "whites have bigger skulls than blacks, so slavery is OK because whites must be smarter"). Others used cultural reasons ("slavery is part of the Southern way of life"). Others were just racist ("blacks are degraded animals and inferior to us; we can do whatever we want to them"). Many used a combination of several of these reasons.
black men and women had to fight for the union and others had to fight for the confederatcy
Manifest Destiny was the belief that it was the United States' destiny and duty to expand its control and influence from the Atlantic to the Pacific. The primary sources attached to this question provide different perspectives on whether Manifest Destiny was justified. The first primary source, a speech given by John L. O'Sullivan in 1845, is in support of Manifest Destiny. O’Sullivan argues that the United States has a right and a duty to expand its control and influence, as the country was founded on the principles of freedom and democracy. He states that it is the United States' "manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions." The second primary source, a speech given by Chief Seattle in 1854, is in opposition to Manifest Destiny. Chief Seattle argues that Manifest Destiny is an imperialistic endeavor that will bring destruction and death to the Indigenous peoples of North America. He states that the "White Man” will take their land and resources, and that their culture will be destroyed in the process. It is difficult to determine whether Manifest Destiny was justified, as it depends on the individual's perspective. Some may argue that Manifest Destiny was justified, as it allowed the country to expand its influence and spread democracy throughout the continent. Others may argue that Manifest Destiny was not justified, as it brought destruction and death to Indigenous peoples and their cultures.
protectors
It Protectors
Killing someone is not justified unless it is in self-defense or defense of others in imminent danger. If Johnny killed Bob without valid cause, it would not be considered justified.
schiziod
The African culture is a very diffrent culture to any others
aggressive driver
aggressive driver
It all depends on what you think after you have studied it. What is justified to one person is inexcusable to someone else. In my opinion, some of the American grievances were fully justified. Others like the Stamp Act were overblown.
Some of the pilot was filmed in Western Pennsylvania but the rest of it is filmed here in Southern California. In fact CSI, Nightrider, NCIS, older Power Rangers, Star Trek and several others are filmed in the same locations.
culture blending is when different cultures come together and use each others culture ideas.
In Greek mythology, the killing of Phineas by Perseus was seen as justified because Phineas was threatening Perseus's wife, Andromeda, and showed hostility towards him. Additionally, Phineas was portrayed as a villain who had wronged others, which further justified Perseus's actions in seeking revenge.
A person's culture impacts their social expectation of others by giving them a standard to judge others. People tend to judge others based on their cultural norms. It gives them a frame of reference.