The land owners took advantage of the sharecroppers leaving them poor and in need.
The landowner was more likely to gain from the contract.
An increasing difference between wealthy landowners and workers
They did not have enough money to pay for supplies from the company store.
They did not have enough money to pay for supplies from the company store.
Depends on the condition. The coin you have is probably worth between 25 cents and $1.
In colonial times, voting was restricted much more that it is today. Although the specifics varied among the colonies, in general voting was restricted to white. male landowners over the age of 21.
They favored the landowner.
It is 'probably true' that all these contracts heavily favored the landowner. He kept the books and could manipulate costs and profits at will. And of course: no profit, no profit share and payment for the sharecropper. Also, it is true that many landowners had a 'company store' that the sharecroppers were obliged to use. So, even if there was a profit share, most or all of it went to the payment of the debt run up at that store.
The portion of the crop the landowner owed to the sharecropper
because the serfs were slaves and had no freedom and were part of the landowners property
They had no choice about continuing to work
They had no choice about continuing to work
They had no choice about continuing to work.
They had no choice about continuing to work
They had no choice about continuing to work
They had no choice about continuing to work.
They had no choice about continuing to work.
They had no choice about continuing to work.