The landowners both had former slaves and poor whites working for them.
Taxes required of poor farmers -APEX
Landowners took advantage of the workers
scalawags
they refused to sell goods to them
It kept the black farmers poor and dependent on white landowners.
Sharecropping
No, former slaves were not the only ones who were sharecroppers. Sharecropping system also involved poor white farmers who did not have land of their own and worked on a share basis for landowners. Sharecropping was a widespread system in the American South after the Civil War.
Sharecropping largely took place in the Southern United States following the Civil War, particularly in states such as Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia. It was a system in which former slaves and poor white farmers would rent land from landowners in exchange for a portion of their crops.
Sharecropping perpetuated a cycle of poverty for many Southern farmers, as they were often unable to earn enough to pay off their debts and gain independence. It also reinforced racial hierarchies and exploitation, as the majority of sharecroppers were Black farmers who faced discrimination and limited opportunities for economic advancement. Additionally, sharecropping contributed to the concentration of land and wealth in the hands of a few large landowners, further widening the economic disparities in the region.
Sharecropping was often referred to as a new form of slavery because tenants were bound to their landowners economically, much like slaves were tied to their owners. Sharecroppers rarely had autonomy or control over their own lives and were often kept in cycles of debt and poverty, similar to the conditions faced by slaves. Additionally, sharecroppers were often subject to exploitative contracts and harsh treatment by landowners.
Sharecropping was common among poor farmers because they lacked the resources to own land and equipment needed for large-scale farming. Landowners provided them with land, seeds, and tools in exchange for a share of the crops produced. This system perpetuated a cycle of debt and poverty for many sharecroppers.
It kept them dirt poor and always indebted to their landlords.
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
Sharecropping was very popular after the end of slavery in the US. It enabled very poor farmers of any color to earn a living from land owned by someone else. Debt peonage kept workers poor by forcing them to purchase goods from company run stores. This occurred both in the coal mines and in sharecropping.
As Rome grew, many Rome's rich landowners lived on huge estates. Small farmers found it difficult to compete with the large estates. So a large number of them old their lands to wealthy landowners. They became poor and jobless. So if they limited the size of the roman estates, the small farmers wouldn't have to sell lands and become poor.
Sharecropping was a legal practice after the Civil War because it provided a way for former slaves and poor whites to work the land without having to own it. Landowners would allow tenants to use their land in exchange for a percentage of the crops grown. This system perpetuated a cycle of debt and poverty for the sharecroppers.