The two party system had a really complex development, but part of it was that with more than two, the person who got the most votes could be overturned by a collaboration of two other parties. This is normal and healthy and accepted in many countries, but in the US it was seen as low and dirty, and many people have worked to not allow that to happen again. There are still many parties that can run in the US, but It is always a threat in any three part (or more) contest, because someone will bow out and, if popular, can determine the winner by asking followers to choose one candidate over the other, so many people discourage it.
labor shortages, slavery and cash crops led to the development of the Plantation system.
No
The development led to the fall of New France in the French and Indian War was the capture of Quebec.
mostly slavery
The growing immigrant population in the United States led to the creation of the what?
I'm not sure but i think that what led to the development of a two-party system was the differences between Jefferson and Hamilton.
I'm not sure but i think that what led to the development of a two-party system was the differences between Jefferson and Hamilton.
I'm not sure but i think that what led to the development of a two-party system was the differences between Jefferson and Hamilton.
Slavery
large cities
Large Cities.
A single-party led republic.
labor shortages, slavery and cash crops led to the development of the Plantation system.
Democracy, freedom. Federalist 10 by James Madison address this directly. As long as there is freedom, faction will develop. Faction here refers to political parties and other forms of groups people use to promote their political opinions.
it led the party to win the election and institute segregation in the country
ArkWright
State led development is where the Government leads the development in an economy.