It's a privately manufactured novelty coin or a home made glued together kind that has no value at all.
they had a duty to improve society.
African American students suffered damage from being treated differently. APEX
it would help them fit in with white society
it would help them fit in with white society
A claim is a statement that asserts a belief or position, while an argument is a set of reasons presented in support of that claim. In other words, a claim is the main point being made, and an argument provides the rationale or evidence to persuade others of the validity of that claim.
An argument typically consists of a claim, evidence to support that claim, and reasoning that explains how the evidence supports the claim. The claim is the main point being made, the evidence provides support or proof for the claim, and the reasoning connects the evidence to the claim.
The claim is the argument you plan to prove.
to be honest, i dont know the answer either :/
If a module is the sole possessor of a value, it will be passed by value, meaning a copy of the argument will be made and used within the module. This copy will be modified independently of any other modules or the original value.
An oppositional argument is a position taken by one party that directly opposes or refutes a specific claim or argument made by another party. It aims to present counterpoints or different perspectives in response to the original argument.
When a function is passed by value the calling function makes a copy of the passed argument and works on that copy. And that's the reason that any changes made in the argument value does gets reflected to the caller.
Identify the main claim or conclusion being made in the argument. This helps to understand the overall point being argued.
An opposing claim is a statement or argument that contradicts or challenges another claim that has been made. It presents a different perspective or viewpoint on a particular issue or topic, often to engage in debate or discussion.
This is known as the ad hominem fallacy, where an argument attacks the person making the claim instead of addressing the actual argument being made. It disregards the validity of the argument by focusing on irrelevant personal characteristics or actions of the individual. It is important to critique the argument itself rather than attacking the person presenting it.
Reassertion claim type involves restating a previously made claim in a different way or providing additional evidence to support the original claim. This approach helps to reinforce the argument by emphasizing key points or strengthening the evidence.
A writer should use credible sources, such as research studies, expert opinions, statistics, and examples to support a claim or counterclaim. It is essential to provide clear, relevant, and accurate evidence to strengthen the argument and convince the audience of the validity of the point being made. Using a variety of sources can also help to present a well-rounded and persuasive argument.