0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Ross
Fran
TaigaAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
A person who claims her First Amendment rights were violated would have her case tried in?
I dont KNOW the Answer?
What is the judicial branch of government responsible for?
The Judicial Branch is strictly responsible for "interpreting the law". What this means is that the Judicial Branch can overturn laws and bills if it is deemed "unconstitutional". (But only if they are part of a case being heard in that court)
Did the case of Miller v California deal with the issues of obscenity and the opinion was written by wareen burger?
Miller v California was a Landmark United States Supreme Court case that changes the precedence involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the a test called the Miller Test for determining what material was deemed obscene.
Why was the Missouri Compromise of 1850 a link to the US Civil War?
The Missouri Compromise of 1850 was made a moot compromise with the introduction of the Kansas Nebraska Act of 1854. Neither pieces of legislation can be demonstrated as a cause of the US Civil War. And, both laws were deemed unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court in the Dredd Scott case of 1857.
What are 5 bad things reconstruction of the south gave us?
Reconstruction raised taxes for rebuilding. There was corruption in the government. For black people, there were few job oppourtunities. Many black people became sharecroppers. The Ku Klux Klan formed during reconstruction. And even though blacks were supposedly deemed separate but equal, that was not the case. Many whites wanted to stop blacks from voting.
