The question assumes that African American soldiers WERE treated better in Europe than at home. The truth is much more complex. For example - Hitler and many of his followers insisted that those of African extraction were sub-human (which is one of the reasons he was infuriated and embarrassed when Jesse Owens did so well in the Berlin Olympics). Consequently, African American soldiers were sometimes treated far worse as POWs. It is also true that many of the regions near the Mediterranean had built up bigotry against those from across the Mediterranean in Africa and applied those attitudes to African-American soldiers.
With that said - many times the African-Americans WERE treated better in Europe than at home. Slavery took longer to die out in the US than in most of Europe so they were further removed from those attitudes. Africans - being in closer proximity to Europe than America - were somewhat more common to the Europeans as just being from Another Country rather than as part of an established underclass. There is also the factor that as liberating soldiers they were being welcomed regardless of ethnic origin - which certainly would give them a higher status than they enjoyed at home. This reception was, of course general to ALL the liberating soldiers, black, white, green, or purple.
slavery started in 1440 when Portugal started trading slaves to western Europe
They were brought in from Africa, although they are called AFRICAN-Americans most of them come from Asia and Europe.
American culture was greatly influenced by European culture, especially during the European migration to the United States in the early 1900's. It was also influenced by the African slave trade. Many of these characteristics were integrated into the American culture, such as music, food, and lifestyle.
Approximately 2 million American soldiers served in Europe during World War I. The U.S. entered the war in April 1917, and by the time the conflict ended in November 1918, American forces had played a significant role in several key battles, contributing to the overall Allied victory. The American Expeditionary Forces were instrumental in shifting the tide of the war in favor of the Allies.
i am wondering the same thing y dont anyone else type an answer for me by the way this is amber gregory and thats my question
112,000 died in Europe
To sell them as slaves.
West Africa, Europe, the Caribbean (Latin)
By the time of the Mexican-American War, U.S. soldiers were technologically equivalent to those of Europe due to advances
France is in Europe but have land claims in the North American, South American, African, and Oceania continents.
depends what war :) haha
Initially, lack of battle experience.
US POWs in Europe were treated with respect and accorded the treatment under the Geneva Convention(s). In the beginning of WW2, US POWs in the Pacific were treated as soldiers that had broken the code of honorable fighting men, and had chosen surrender over fighting to the death. Coupled with the humidity and starving conditions of vast travelling areas of obtaining resupply of food, medical supplies, equipment, etc. living conditions/treatment of US/Allied POWs was extremely harsh; especially when compared to conditions experienced by ETO (European Theater of Operations) POWs.
American and European slave owners wanted cheap labour.
For the majority of WW2, Japanese Americans served in Japanese American military units; such as the famed US Army 442nd Regimental Combat Team, in Europe. With the US at war with Japan, folks felt abit uneasy about having armed Japanese American soldiers side by side with them; loyalty was the issue.
slavery started in 1440 when Portugal started trading slaves to western Europe
The six major plates are the American, African, Eurasian (Europe and Asia), Indian, Pacific, and Antarctic plates.