Workers were not well organized, they had little public engorgement, and strikers could be easily replaced.
After the Missouri Compromise, most Americans in the 1830s and 1840s recognized slavery as a deeply divisive issue, with many in the North increasingly viewing it as morally wrong and advocating for its abolition. In the South, however, slavery was seen as essential to the economy and way of life, leading to a growing defensive mindset among Southern slaveholders. This period saw the rise of abolitionist movements in the North, heightening tensions between the two regions and foreshadowing conflicts that would culminate in the Civil War. Overall, opinions on slavery were polarized, setting the stage for further political and social strife.
Most wanted the south to continue to have slavery. Most were opposed to abolition. Most did not want it to spread at all.
This question seems to speak about US history. In the South, most crop workers were slaves. In the North, farmlands were worked by farm owners and their paid farm workers.
slave resistance on plantations was unsuccessful because the plantation owners were united and if a slave tried to escape they would help each other find him/her. another reason is because slaves were often too scared to resist, they would be made to watch others being punished (most common if whipping) or have been punished themselves.
In the 1840s, most people did not earn a lot of money, as the economy was primarily agrarian and labor-intensive. Many individuals worked as farmers or laborers, earning modest incomes that often depended on the season and local market conditions. Additionally, the industrial revolution was just beginning to take hold, leading to some wage growth for factory workers, but overall economic disparity remained high. Consequently, wealth was concentrated among a small elite, while the majority of the population struggled to make ends meet.
in the 1800s, why were many labor strikes unsuccessful?
Northern Woman
Ireland
Ireland and Germany
unconvincing and confrontational
The term 'sure thing' which refers to a decision or action with a guaranteed positive outcome was coined in America in the 1830s or the 1840s. The term 'sure thing' is most commonly used in gambling.
Throughout most of the 1830s and 1840s, Italy struggled to become a unified nation-state. Various regions were divided under foreign rule and local monarchies, leading to a rise in nationalist sentiments and movements seeking unification. The period was marked by political upheaval, revolutions, and the efforts of key figures such as Giuseppe Mazzini and Giuseppe Garibaldi, who aimed to consolidate the fragmented states into a single Italian kingdom. Ultimately, these struggles laid the groundwork for the eventual unification of Italy in 1861.
Northern and mid-Atlantic port cities.New York, Boston, Philadelphia, and Chicago--but all over the US, actually.
After the Missouri Compromise of 1820, most Americans in the 1830s and 1840s agreed that slavery was a contentious issue that needed to be addressed, but opinions were deeply divided along regional lines. Many in the South supported the institution of slavery, viewing it as essential to their agricultural economy, while many in the North began to increasingly oppose it on moral and political grounds. The compromise had temporarily settled the balance between free and slave states, but it also highlighted the growing sectional tensions that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Thus, while there was a general acknowledgment of the issue, consensus on its future remained elusive.
Poker
gical concept strikes you most?
Catholicism.