It was unpopular because if the King does not has any natural heir but he has his brothers or another person in his family then the king would like to give his territry to them after his death.
By M.H.KHAN.
The doctrine made the Indians the "right occupant" while giving legal ownership to the European governments.
they werent
a doctrine of containment :p
the men chosen as tax collectors knew they were unpopular, and those in Boston were protected by two regiments of redcoats (bristish soilders).
Writer: John Steinbeck
It is a consequence and its a part oF "DOCTRINE OF LAPSE"
The Doctrine of Lapse was unpopular among many Indians because it allowed the British East India Company to annex states without direct heirs, undermining traditional rulers and displacing established dynasties. This policy incited fears of losing sovereignty and cultural identity, as it disregarded the legitimacy of Indian hereditary succession. Additionally, it was seen as an expansionist strategy that threatened the autonomy of Indian princely states, leading to widespread resentment and distrust towards British rule. The discontent contributed to the growing nationalist sentiments that eventually culminated in the Indian Rebellion of 1857.
its was some weird lapse done by formula 1 racers
You can destroy doctrine of lapse by using democracy or government system or the ruler of the state should have a natural heir.
warren hasting
DOCTORINE OF LAPSE
hindi q rin alam
The Doctrine of Lapse is the main reason.
The policies are subsidary alliance,judiciary system,doctrine of lapse
satara , jaipur , sammbhalpur , udaipur , jhansi and nagpur.
Because doctrine of lapse alarmed theRuling classes who had over the years
Indians believe in karma doctrine , reincarnation and liberation.