answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

they were convicted of murder without hard evidence

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti were Italian-born anarchists who were convicted of murdering two men during the armed robbery of a shoe factory in South Braintree, Massachusetts in 1920. There are a lot of people who think they may have been wrongfully convicted. There is no study on that though.

User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Many believed the two Italians did not receive a fair trial because of the anti-immigrant and anti-radical ideals of the era.

User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

They were foreign (Italian) and they were anarchists. America was experiencing a fair amount of xenophobia at the time, and Sacco and Vanzetti were used to illustrate this.

User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Because the evidence against them convinced the jury of their guilt.

Although many people still have different opinions on whether they were guilty or not.

The question is moot!

User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

all of the above - apex

User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why were the executions of Sacco and Venzetti controversial?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why were the executions of sacco and vanzetti controversial apex?

They were convicted of murder without hard evidence.


What did the executions of Sacco and Vanzetti demonstrate?

Isolationism


What was the significance of the executions of Sacco and Vanzetti?

Their conviction was based on their politics and their ethnicity


Why were executions of sacco and vanzetti controversil?

they were convicted of murder without hard evidence


What was the significance of the executions of nicola sacco and vanzetti?

Their conviction was based on their politics and their ethnicity


What was the significants of the executions of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti?

Their conviction was based on their politics and their ethnicity


What was significance of the executions of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti?

Their conviction was based on their politics and their ethnicity


Why were the excursions of Sacco and Vanzetti controversial?

They were convicted of murder without hard evidence.


Do you believe that venzetti was telling the truth in his final statement Give reasons for your answer?

No. I do not believe that venzetti was telling the truth in his final statement.


Anarchists executed after controversial 1920 robbery trial?

In 1920, two Italian-born anarchists, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, were convicted and later executed in the United States for a robbery and murder they claimed they did not commit. The trial was highly controversial, with many believing they were wrongly convicted due to their anarchist beliefs and immigrant status. Despite worldwide protests and appeals, Sacco and Vanzetti were executed in 1927.


What was most controversial about the trial of Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti in 1920?

Many believed they were convicted for being immigrants and radical anarchists rather than the crime.


Why was the sacco and vanzetti trial so controversial?

Many believed the two Italians did not receive a fair trial because of the anti-immigrant and anti-radical ideals of the era.