Answer this question…
Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Documents bring us true facts that we can learn. History in part is a dificult to hard to study because of the amount of document existing, but it takes us to understand it.
Primary sources are the least likely to have been corrupted by the authors' interpretations of what happened and why.
True.
any events
Historical events and births for January 2?
It is difficult to read and correctly interpret because it was so influenced by the historical events that happened just before it was written.
timeline
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
A historian uses primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time under study, to gain a direct understanding of historical events. They also use secondary sources, such as books or articles written by other scholars, which interpret and analyze primary sources to provide context and a broader understanding of the historical period.
A liberal historian believes historical events are led by individuals and political leaders, as opposed to a revisionist historian who believes events are led by mass movement of people or ideas.
A historian's upbringing can influence their interpretation of historical events; for example, a Jewish historian may have a more negative view of World War Two than another, due to the events (Jewish persecution) that took place during that time in history.
True.
No. A historian needs to be objective rather than to prove a preconceived idea. In the past when the study of history was new there were men who did approach what they studied with discriminatory ideas and preconceived ideas to prove the culture they were studying was inferior or lacking.
Both a detective and an historian seek out facts. They both gather information of what has happened in the past. The detective tries to solve crimes that has all ready taken place. An historian tries to solve historical events, and gain an insight into people's lives, places they lived in, how they survived, and events that happened to them in history.
You would consult a primary source for a first and personal view of an historical event. Primary sources are original materials.
Carlo Ginzburg is known for his works on the history of witchcraft, such as "The Night Battles" and "Ecstasies: Deciphering the Witches' Sabbath." He is an Italian historian and pioneer of microhistory, which focuses on studying local events and individuals to understand broader historical trends.
The term for a poet who writes about history is a "historical poet" or a "poet historian." These poets draw inspiration from historical events, figures, and contexts to create their work, often blending creative storytelling with factual accounts.
If he was a military historian. Other historians look at social and developments and regressions.
Answer this questio A historian using the historical thinking skill of chronological thinking might: n…