Best Answer

Yes they did

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did the leaders peacefully give in to the people's demands?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about World History

Who were the political leaders during the Victorian Period? this will give you all the political leaders of the Victorian era. your welcome -rick

Why did the Treaty of Versailles cause problems?

The treaty of Versailles was an cause of the Holocaust. The demands placed on Germany in the treaty required the country to give lands back to the Allied forces or back to the people that had populated them, such as East Prussia which was supposd to be returned to Poland. In addition to this provision, the heartland of Germany also had to accept military forces being stationed throughout Germany to guard against another war for the following fifteen years. The central part of Germany was demilitarized.

Was Kaiser Wilhelm II against entering World War 1?

No: He expected Germany to be victorious. Are you kidding? Andrew Carnegie represented a huge Western consortium of major businesses when he offered Kaiser Wilhelm and Germany a multi-bllion-dollar package of aid to address his stated concerns regarding their parity with other Western European nations. The Kaiser thanked Carnegie, but then waxed on about the German peoples' historical grievances, etc. etc. And on another count, in the Balkans, the Serbs had aquiesced to the Austrian Hungarian rulers there on all but a few remaining points in demands which they had felt strongly about, having to do with preserving their ethnic identity. Even the Austrian & Hungarian leaders told Kaiser Wilhelm in the event that the Serbs could not realistically be expected to back down those last emaining positions, and still retain their honour. But the Kaiser demanded they give in on everything, and this as much as other causes led to war. Along with some historians, I suspect the Kaiser's interest in war was fueled by Britain's difficulties in defeating the Boers of South Africa (nearly 400,000 Brit troops to about 80,000 Boers). If you really wish to delve very deeply into root psychology behind this war, there are credible historians who point out the links going back nearly 300 years to the Thirty Years War, which devastated Germany and its population so badly that it took many generations to begin recovering.

Why did he give such a cruel proclamation?

We don't know who you are asking about so you need to give us a name.

Why did imperial powers give up their empires after World War 2?

Chris, No, it was not because the Soviet Union demanded it. The circumstances differed from one country and colony to another but there were two factors that, I think, played the biggest role. One was that after the war the European countries were too exhausted and too broke to bear the expenses of empire. It was no longer necessary to have the colonies in order to secure their economic strength and, indeed, the colonies were a drain on recources. Thus there was pressure to let them go. The second factor was that, in the wake of both world wars, European peoples attitudes about empire and self determination went through a significant change. Having experienced for themselves foreign conquest they no longer felt justified in denying soveriegnty to other peoples who plainly desired it for themselves.Michael Montagne One thesis suggested for at least the colonies of southeast Asia, was that the colonial populations after WWII could see the weakness of the Europeans and would not be cowed by them any longer. This made them more restive, no longer willing to put up with colonialism, more willing to rebel against the colonial masters. Sincerely,Paul The Imperial Powers gave up their soverignty over their Empires because of two factors: One was the Soviet Union wanted to have supremacy over the world.If the Western Powers didn't let go their colonies, the Union would have been threatened. The second reason was that the present Imperial soverigns were weak and wanted to appeal to the world they were not conqurers. They didn't have the skills to govern their Empires and had to give them the chance of being a democracy. They didn't have the strength like other leaders like Napolion and Queen Victoria. Overall, I think the main cause of the Empires's desolution were the leaders. if by the imperial powers you mean sucha s the british giving up sovreignty of countries such as malaya and so forth, a theory put forward by many is that the Japanese in taking power in these countries had sowed the seed for change already, and shown citizens that they were not inferior to the white rulers. And so the uprising was instilled then. The myth of white supremecy was shattered by the conquests of the Japanese

Related questions

What word means to to give into demands?

Concession or to concede.

What is List of demands with threats?

Give me your money or else I kill you

What is the settlement that both sides give up demands?


How do the present rulers react the people demand?

The present group of world leaders range from top leaders of democratic nations to nations that are run by dictatorships. And, all sorts of things in between. This means monarchies to religious run governments, where members of the clergy are also the political leaders. How these various types of leaders react to demands by their people depends on the amount of liberty each country has. Generally speaking, democratic leaders are more receptive to their peoples demands.

What was the plan to meet Hitler's demands in Europe?

The plan the Allies did to give Hitler his demands was during the Munich conference and they gave him Czechoslovakia.

Why were peole against appeasement?

A lot of people were against appeasement because it was viewed as giving Hitler what he wanted. Many felt that by continuing to give him what he wanted, his demands would escalate and he would perceive the other world leaders as weak and easily manipulated.

How can you find the gym leaders?

the people give you hints to find gym leaders.

What is it called to give into someones demands to avoid conflict?

It is called acquiescing or capitulating.

Can you give me a sentence for bureau?

b*******************************************ing peoples

What is the name give to rich peoples clubs?

There is no name

Can salt give you blisters?

For the majority of normal peoples - no.

How can government help people in need?

they give out taxes, and give out job for peoples who need it