first we need to know what oral tradition is and what oral history means. oral tradition is the basic form of historical consciousness for societies in the period of their development, prior to the establishment of a written culture. it can also mean the preservation of personal and cultural history in the oral communication of stories, songs, poems, ballads and folklore. Oral history on the other hand, is the systematic collection of living people's testimony about themselves. However, there are differences between these two. oral tradition means the transmission of cultural material through vocal utterances, painting of the people, the myths of the origin of the people and such related unwritten conversation on salient issues concerning the people; while oral history is a written work of history based on interviews with or recording of participants.
Oral means spoken, so no. But it can be written down later, at which time it is written history, not oral history.
Griots are north Africans that tell oral history. oral history is history that is recorded on a book but is told with plays. they act out history and anything else. ~Kaylana~
An example of Oral History would be something like aboriginal folklore that has been passed down from person to person by story telling.
The problems of oral history are that inaccuracies can occur by the fact that the longer the oral history is in place, the more chances there are for honest errors in passing on the stories of events and information about earlier civilizations. Another problem exists in that it would be only natural for the oral history spokesman to have different versions of the same set of facts or circumstances. Even in written history this can occur. In addition to the above, there is always the chance that stories are "on purpose" twisted to favor one point of view over another.
The development of writing was a key ingredient to the progress of mankind. Writing allowed for better communications, record keeping, and had the oral tradition of passing down information made obsolete. It opened the way for the arts and sciences as well.
history is normally written down and oral tradition isn't.
The importance of oral tradition is that it helps pass on the history from one generation to another.
That is called oral tradition.
Mark Amodio has written: 'Writing the oral tradition' -- subject(s): English poetry, History, History and criticism, Oral communication, Oral tradition, Oral-formulaic analysis, Written communication
the passing on of history. tradition and laws.
This is an example of oral tradition. It involves passing down stories, history, and cultural knowledge through spoken word rather than written text. Oral traditions are important for preserving and transmitting cultural heritage in societies without a writing system.
why was oral tradition important before writing was invented
The role of oral tradition has been vital in Native American history. Native Americans had no writing system so the only way to pass down history and folk lore was through the tradition of oral story telling.
oral tradition
what antonyms for oral tradition
it is difficult for oral tradition to be a means of historical archives because humans forget. and so eventually old knowledge would be forgotten.
A story or legend passed down from generation to generation is called oral history, oral tradition, or folklore.