answersLogoWhite

0

Answer this question…

They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?

The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.


How historians study the past?

Historians study the past by studying the previous recorded events of the past activities. They use both the scientific and traditional methods to gather such information which they then use to compile their documentary evidence.


What can historians learn from archeological evidence?

Historians can learn about past societies' daily life, cultural practices, and technological advancements from archaeological evidence. By studying artifacts, structures, and landscapes, historians can gain insights into ancient economies, social structures, and religious beliefs. Additionally, archaeological evidence can provide information about trade networks, migration patterns, and interactions between different societies.


What evidence historians have for how the Nok people lived?

Historians rely on archaeological evidence to understand how the Nok people lived. This includes excavations of Nok settlements, artifacts such as terracotta figurines and iron tools, and analysis of environmental factors like soil composition and vegetation. By studying these aspects, historians can piece together a picture of the Nok people's daily life, social organization, and economic activities.


Why do historians sometimes draw different conclusions about the same event?

Historians have different views about the same event because of bias, gender, because of personal background., etc. And example of this would be the holocaust. As we all know the Holocaust did happen. but some people will try to say no its not real and it did not happen. it just all depends on the evidence and you and what you are willing to believe!~K.Zebra~


What do historians believe of about the harappans from studying their cities?

They have learned something


What do historians look for when studying history?

they look for features of a nation


How did romanticism influence the study of history?

Romanticism influenced the study of history by emphasizing emotion, imagination, and individual experience in historical narratives. Historians began to focus on personal stories, the impact of major events on individuals, and the cultural significance of historical periods. This shift led to a more subjective and interpretive approach to studying the past.


What is the definition of literary evidence?

litrary evidences are \manuscripts written records


How do historians use artifacts?

Historians use artifacts to better understand past cultures, societies, and events. By studying these physical objects, historians can gain insights into daily life, societal structures, beliefs, and technologies of the past. Artifacts provide tangible evidence that complements written records and oral histories, helping historians construct a more complete picture of history.


Why do historians need archaeologists and anthropologists?

Historians need archaeologists to provide physical evidence to support their theories and interpretations about past societies. Anthropologists help historians understand the cultural context of historical events by studying human societies, behaviors, and beliefs. Together, archaeologists and anthropologists provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the past.


What do historians gain by studying famous and ordinary people?

they increase their understanding of the past