answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Answer this question…

They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago
yes
More answers
User Avatar

Chris Bandera

Lvl 7
7mo ago

They can lead historians to arrive at very different interpretations of an event

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How can personal biases and points of view influence historians when they are studying evidence?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?

The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.


How historians study the past?

Historians study the past by studying the previous recorded events of the past activities. They use both the scientific and traditional methods to gather such information which they then use to compile their documentary evidence.


Why do historians sometimes draw different conclusions about the same event?

Historians have different views about the same event because of bias, gender, because of personal background., etc. And example of this would be the holocaust. As we all know the Holocaust did happen. but some people will try to say no its not real and it did not happen. it just all depends on the evidence and you and what you are willing to believe!~K.Zebra~


What do historians look for when studying history?

they look for features of a nation


What do historians believe of about the harappans from studying their cities?

They have learned something


What is the definition of literary evidence?

litrary evidences are \manuscripts written records


What do historians gain by studying famous and ordinary people?

they increase their understanding of the past


What do historians gain by studying both famous and ordinary people?

they increase their understanding of the past


Why do historians need to be worried about reports with bias in them?

Historians need to be concerned about reports with bias because bias can distort the accuracy and objectivity of historical information. It can lead to incomplete or misleading interpretations of events, which can impact the overall understanding of the past. Historians strive to present a balanced and unbiased view of history to ensure the integrity of their research and analysis.


By studying the lives of both famous and ordinary people historians can gain?

Increase understanding of the past.


What is a historians is doing when she examines the ways different historical cultures recorded history?

Studying historiography


Indirect evidence of earth's interior comes from studying rock samples?

direct evidence from rock samples and indirect evidence from seismic waves