answersLogoWhite

0

no one nos and please someone come on help me this is homework

It is logical that peace at home would be a help to the ordinary people of England in the Elizabethan age (or any age, come to that), because their best menfolk would not be off fighting wars, but be at home being productive in the fields and workplaces. They would not have to worry about their fathers, husbands and sons being killed, when they would have been the family breadwinners. Resources may also have been scarcer during warfare. There would be no extra taxes to pay for waging war, which must have been terrible for poorer people who were struggling anyway.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did peace at home help the ordinary people of England in the Elizabethan age?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about World History

What countries were slaves taken to?

they were taken to ENGLAND MAARNN WICKED !! PEACE YA'LL!X ;)


Is the world peace impossible?

world peace isn't impossible , peace is generated within the hearts of the people and spreads within the community,........!!! peace will only come when people wont be hostile towards other community and would live for the betterment of there people and wont be ENVIOUS from the progress of other community....!!!!


The Paris peace conference denied self-determination to the people of?

Iraq


What nations attended Paris Peace Conference?

US, England, France, I think Austria, Germany, and Russia did not attend. But you might want to go to wikepedia for that.


What does Peace cannot be kept by force It can only be achieved by understanding mean?

The kind of "peace" that is maintained by force is only an illusion of peace. If people only refrain from hurting each other because they are afraid of someone else (police, or an army, or whatever), then this is not "peace": it is merely little bullies held in check by larger bullies. Real peace only happens when people do not want to hurt each other. You don't "make peace" with another person or community by holding a gun to them so that they're too afraid to hurt you (yet this is what many people think of as "peace": a so-called peace maintained by force, waiting at any moment to erupt into violence again). To really make peace with another is not to force them to behave "peacefully", but to join forces with them, to understand and help them, until they count you as a friend and could think of nothing worse than hurting you. Real peace does not need force: it comes from understanding.