In what three ways was the power of the English monarch limited by the English bill of rights?

Answer 1

Power of suspending the laws or the execution of the laws by regal royal authority.

Answer 2

Ah, the English Bill of Rights, a beautiful document full of balance and harmony. It limited the monarch's power by ensuring free elections, allowing regular parliamentary sessions, and guaranteeing freedom of speech in Parliament. Just like painting a serene landscape, these limitations created a peaceful and fair governing system for all to enjoy.

Answer 3

Oh, dude, the English Bill of Rights was like, "Hey, monarch, you can't just do whatever you want." It limited the monarch's power by requiring Parliament's approval for taxes, ensuring free elections, and protecting freedom of speech in Parliament. So, like, no more ruling like a total dictator, you know?

Answer 4

Well, honey, the English Bill of Rights put the monarchy on a bit of a leash by requiring parliamentary approval for taxes, ensuring free elections, and prohibiting the monarch from interfering with the law. In other words, it basically told the king to sit down, shut up, and follow the rules like everyone else.

Answer 5

It did not allow the monarch to suspend laws, tax without parliaments consent, or to raise an army in peacetime without approval by the parliament. answer came from the textbook "modern world history" McDougal Littell page 23 in The Rise of Democratic Ideas chapter.

Answer 6

Oh that a hard one i dunno to be honest sorry for wastin ur time y do u want it :) :P :>)