answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The phrase "Nulla In Mundo Pax Sincera" translates to "In this world, there is no honest peace"(or true peace)

It is also the title of a motet by Antonio Vivaldi (RV 630).

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What does Nulla in Mundo Pax Sincera mean?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about World History

Why did Britain need colonies?

for the reason of trade more markets to sale goods inBritish wants the colonies cause the colonies have land in America and since the colonies were part of the British, the kind of the land, also after the French and Indian war the British were in debt, so they taxed the colonies to get back their money. In another ward the colonists were the servant of money. If the Britain didn't have the colonists they'd have no one to tax and get money from.


What were some effects of mongol rule on russian?

well their cultures mixed, mongols were foreigners, therefore, some mongols became Confucianists A decrease in the population of northern China The adoption of Square Script


How were the Romans civilised and uncivilised?

even the highest class of Romans liked seeing people slaughtered in amphitheatres and other things to do with blood and gutsAddendum:Civilised (and Uncivilised) has become one of those value-loaded words which are applied, according to preferences and tastes, to people(s) whom you like or don't like.The word comes from civis = city, those who formed themselves into cities had social and governmental srtucture and amenities and were civilised. Those living in tribal situations in the countryside and not citizens were therefore uncivilised ie without the organisation and benefits of being part of and using the advanced life of the cities (another name was pagans = those living about, also now a value-loaded religious word).A common non-value-loaded definition is: 'the social process whereby societies achieve an advanced stage of development and organization'.So were the Romans uncivilised? They were citizens of a city. The city had a strong governmental, legal and religious system. It was properly supplied with defensive walls for security, water, sewerage and an organised corn supply. It had a safety net to support the poor. It had public buildings, art, theatre, and other social amenities to a high standard.Yes, they had some unpleasant tastes and used slaves. Slavery still exists in the world today. In fact looking at the history of slaughter, terror, abuse of those unable to defend or sustain themselves in the world over the past five hundred years, if we are to apply the standard of not being nasty to others, is there any country which today can be called civilised?We either acknowledge that the Romans, by any reasonable standard were civilised, or simply use the word as a label for things we don't like and also brand ourselves as uncivilised also.


Related questions