Standards of living varied enormously between the wealthy and the poor in sixteenth century England.
Increasing commercialisation as towns grew larger and more important, led to wider social mobility and the emergence of the middle classes. The well off were becoming more and more comfortable as England grew Rich from the mining of Tin, Lead, and Coal, and the Iron industry. On the other end of the scale however, peasant labourers grew poorer as the population recovered from the devastation of the Plague two centuries earlier, pushing real earnings down.
With access to improving medical care, education, and living conditions, the better off often lived into their 60's. Between one third and one half of all children however died before the age of 16. The average life expectancy overall was 35 years.
Chat with our AI personalities
Mid 30's would have been considered old
The primary risk to women has been childbirth.
Afghanistan's life expectancy is low not necessarily because the people aren't living as long (though I'm sure that's a minor factor), but because infant mortality (early childhood death) is very high. (24.53 times higher than the U.S. rate in 2008 at 165 deaths per 1,000 born) This dramatically lowers the statistic. It would be like saying the average life expectancy in the U.S. is 50 years old when taking two individuals, 1 who dies at birth (age 0) and one who dies at 100 years.
It was rubbish.
Advantages:more food and comfort, higher living standards, longer life expectancy, Disadvantages: exploitation of poor, pollution, loss of biodiversity, more people