Answer this question…
Historians' own points of view influence how they draw conclusions from evidence.
Chat with our AI personalities
Historians with different points of view may interpret the same sources in different ways.
Historians have different biases and points of view that influence their interpretations. (Apex)
Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence. Some interpretations portray victims in a more sympathetic way than perpetrators.
Because people have different viewpoints.
Some interpreted World War 2 as cleaning the world of Jews.
Others interpreted it as genocide.
It's all about belief.
______________________
Along the same lines, different groups will have different vested interests in the outcomes of certain historical conflicts. So they will attribute different motivations to the main players than others from different positions. It wouldn't be difficult to find statements or writings of individuals to support any number of different motivations that they might have had. Also, some events may be glossed over, forgotten, or intentionally 'hidden' in order to support what a person really believes to be the true interpretation. Other groups will bring those same things to the forefront, and will gloss over the things considered important by the first group. It is very, very difficult to get history 'straight' and to interpret it objectively, if it is even possible.
Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence. Some interpretations portray victims in a more sympathetic way than perpetrators.
Collaborator .
Scandanavia
Christian views on how the world was created vary widely, from belief that the Bible inerrantly describes creation, to an acceptance of the natural processes that created the world over four billion years ago. The decision as to what an individual believes is often based on choosing between faith and reason. In much of Europe, Australia and New Zealand, the scientific explanation is almost universally accepted, while in the United States and the emerging nations of Africa a more Bible-based view is held by the majority of Christians.
The 14 Points were accepted by France and Italy on November 1, 1918. Britain signed off on all except the freedom of the seas later.
The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to enter into this alliance