answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

Answer this question…

Historians' own points of view influence how they draw conclusions from evidence.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Historians with different points of view may interpret the same sources in different ways.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Caitlin Thorsbakken

Lvl 1
1y ago
Primary sources may be incomplete or contradict other sources.-is the right answer for apex.

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Historians have different biases and points of view that influence their interpretations. (Apex)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Vivien Cassin

Lvl 10
2y ago

Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence. Some interpretations portray victims in a more sympathetic way than perpetrators.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

Answer this question…

Primary sources may be incomplete or contradict other sources.

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

J

Lvl 1
3y ago
correct for apex
User Avatar

Lpk

Lvl 1
2y ago
Historians have different biases and points of view that influence their interpretations. (apex)

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Because people have different viewpoints.

Some interpreted World War 2 as cleaning the world of Jews.

Others interpreted it as genocide.

It's all about belief.

______________________

Along the same lines, different groups will have different vested interests in the outcomes of certain historical conflicts. So they will attribute different motivations to the main players than others from different positions. It wouldn't be difficult to find statements or writings of individuals to support any number of different motivations that they might have had. Also, some events may be glossed over, forgotten, or intentionally 'hidden' in order to support what a person really believes to be the true interpretation. Other groups will bring those same things to the forefront, and will gloss over the things considered important by the first group. It is very, very difficult to get history 'straight' and to interpret it objectively, if it is even possible.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Jose Fernandez

Lvl 2
1y ago

[object Object]

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Interpretations differ because they are written for different audiences. Historians select information and when they write they can distort information to make their arguments stronger. Historians change their views when they discover new evidence. Some interpretations portray victims in a more sympathetic way than perpetrators.

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp