The British came to India for reasons of trade - they wanted the goods that were being produced, and they wanted to find a market for the goods that were being produced back in England. The French, Dutch and Portugese also traded with, established forts and cities in, and to a certain extent, colonized the India subcontinent. After various battles, treaties, broken promises, broken treaties and other sometimes underhanded dealings, the British established more or less control of large parts of the subcontinent by the mid 1700s. Some areas never came under direct British control (the Northwest provinces in what is now Pakistan and part of Afghanistan, for one), while some areas welcomed British rule which in these cases was more benevolent than the native rule which it supplanted.
It is connected through trade and Britain used to own the whole of India
India was involved in war with Britain for independence. The first war of independence took place in 1857. India was involved in other wars with Britain afterwards.
Anglicize India.
Britain gave India its independence in 1948, so there is now no British India.
Britain.
no, they did not
Britain used to occupy India, similar to how it once occupied the United States of America, except when India became independent, the inhabitants remained mostly native Indians; not immigrants, like modern Americans.
britain helped india for sucking
jammu and kasmir occupation
The Normans
India is bigger than Britain by a mile
Britain has still contact with India. It is not bad to have them.
India was occupied by Britian.
As occupants of India
It is connected through trade and Britain used to own the whole of India
India was involved in war with Britain for independence. The first war of independence took place in 1857. India was involved in other wars with Britain afterwards.
They didn't so much explore it as occupy it, in 1841.