0
Because of the level of inequality that existed in China before Chairman Mao's 1949 Revolution. Since 1912 China had been under a Nationalist Republican Government led by the Kuomingtang Party established by Sun Yat-Sen, which abolished the Emperorship and set about reforming the country into a democratic republic as oppose to a tyrannical absolute monarchy. Following his death in 1925, he was succeeded in power by General Chiang Kai-Shek, who led the country throughout WW2 on the side of the Allies but who had been in conflict with China's Communist factions for decades (Communist enclaves had developed in the mountainous regions of Northern China ever since the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917, and had been funded by the USSR and growing in power and influence over the years). Following the end of WW2 , civil war broke out between Kai-Shek's KMT Government and the Communist Party of China led by Mao, which resulted in General Chiang resigning and fleeing to Taiwan in 1949, which he proclaimed the de facto 'Republic of China' and where he remained until his death in 1975. The Government during the civil war against Mao's Communists was taken over by the short-lived rule of Li Zongren, who was overthrown later on in 1949 when China became a fully Communist state. The peasantry aligned themselves with Mao quite simply because the prospect of Communist Government offered them equality, an end to serfdom, and shared and collectivised wealth. It promised a welfare state for everybody including free health care and education, housing, sanitation, adequate food and a transport infrastructure- something which the peasants could only have dreamed about for many Centuries. This did, indeed, come to pass, but not without an end to tyranny and human rights abuse. Ever since 1949, China's Communist Government has made things better for people materially but not improved upon human rights. Under all Chinese rulers, from the Emperors through the Republican Government and up until Communism, Chinese citizens have been deliberately subject to mass executions, torture and deliberate genocide via starvation if they were deemed to be enemies of the State. The Emperors and Empresses, Chiang Kai-Shek and Chairman Mao Tse-Tung were all guilty of atrocities and mass murder. Many of the good things that Mao did, such as ensuring complete equality of wealth and communal ownership, were undone by Dun Xiaoping in the 1980s and '90s by his advocacy of 'Capitalism within Communism' which permitted private enterprise, a free market economy and the development of inequality through wealth, but only modest improvements in human rights standards. Thus nowadays, the Chinese have got the worst of both systems, although a system of social welfare does still exist, and although the regime is still a Dictatorship, it does not practice the policies of mass genocide as seen under Mao.
What else can I help you with?
Why did many people not accept the new national boundaries of europe?
Many people did not accept the new national boundaries of Europe due to a sense of ethnic and cultural identity that did not align with the imposed borders. The redrawing of boundaries often disregarded historical ties and the complexities of local demographics, leading to discontent among various groups. Additionally, the arbitrary nature of some boundaries, established after events like World War I and World War II, fostered feelings of injustice and resentment, as communities found themselves divided or forced into new national identities that did not reflect their heritage. This discontent often fueled nationalist movements and conflicts in the following decades.
What is the meaning for third world countries?
The original intent was referring to countries that did not align with either major power bloc during the Cold War. - However, the meaning has now apparently evolved to refer to poorly developed, less industrialised and politically unsophisticated countries.
Is monde masculine or feminine?
The French word "monde," meaning "world," is masculine. It is used with masculine articles and adjectives, such as "le monde" (the world). In terms of grammatical gender, it is important to remember that in French, nouns are assigned a gender that may not always align with their meaning.
Was there a better opportunity for world peace after World War 1 or after World War 2?
AnswerHistorians argue that after WWII "Peace broke out" largely as a result of the proliferation of nuclear weapons which gave rise to the "MAD" or mutually assured destruction among the world's super powers. World wars were replaced by multiple low intensity conflicts such as Korea and Vietnam where client states, often second and third world countries did much of the actual fighting while the U.S. or Russia supplied strategic and tactical support.The concern today is that a number of these smaller countries that do not align themselves with the superpowers seek or have acquired their own nuclear weapons.After WWI the profoundly flawed Treaty of Versailles so crippled the peace for Germany that a 'rematch' (WWII) was inevitable.When you think about it I say WW2 it was certain Germans were defeated after WW2 (if only this was accepted after WW1)Germany saw the attrocitys they had done and so they accepted defeat. True wars have happened since but there were mini wars after WW1
Is the ambassador of Vienna neutral in his comments or does he favor one country over another in world war 1?
The ambassador of Vienna, as a representative of Austria-Hungary during World War I, typically expressed views that favored the interests of his own country. His comments often reflected the political and military stance of Austria-Hungary, particularly in relation to conflicts with Serbia and the Entente powers. While he might have occasionally acknowledged the perspectives of other nations, his overall position would align with promoting Austria-Hungary's objectives, indicating a lack of neutrality.
Why did peasants align with Chinese communists?
Life could only get better. It gave some relief from the grinding poverty they suffered. It is obvious to any student of history and observer of human nature that if the ruling group treads on people hard enough they will finally revolt because they were given no choice. all revolutions begin that way. Communist uprisings like the Chinese example are no different. Whatever you think of communism or revolutions they would not have occured in the first place if the populace had been well treated. Your question is a good example of how politically naive and downtrodden peasants will align themselves to a group that promises better.
Who did Chinas peasants align themselves with in the 1920s?
The Communists
Why did Philadelphians in the 1820s model their own buildings after those in Greece?
to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy To align themselves with the ideals of democracy as represented by those cultures, which included Greece.
Why would a city like Philadelphia model their own 19th century after those in another country?
to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy To align themselves with the ideals of democracy as represented by those cultures, which included Greece.
Why would a city like Philadelphia model their own century building after those in another country?
to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy To align themselves with the ideals of democracy as represented by those cultures, which included Greece.
What three choices did Chinese communist revolutionaries face in view of the growing peasant movement?
Chinese communist revolutionaries faced three primary choices regarding the growing peasant movement: first, they could align closely with the peasants to harness their support for revolutionary goals; second, they could seek to moderate their demands to maintain broader political alliances; or third, they might attempt to suppress or control the movement if it threatened the party's authority. Ultimately, the communists chose to embrace and mobilize the peasant movement, recognizing it as vital for their strategy in overthrowing the ruling regime and establishing a socialist state. This decision significantly shaped the course of the Chinese Revolution.
Why would a city like Philadelphia model their own 19th century buildings after those in another city?
to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy to align themselves with the idea of democracy To align themselves with the ideals of democracy as represented by those cultures, which included Greece.
Why did the Chinese sailors use a lodestone?
Chinese sailors used a lodestone as a compass for navigation because lodestones are naturally magnetized stones that can align themselves with the Earth's magnetic field. This property allowed them to determine the direction they were traveling in, aiding in their exploration and trade expeditions.
What does the Chinese calendar align perfectly with?
the alignment of the planetS: jupiTer, satUrn, rP900, and M30. It coulD also align with the order of the sun rays.
How do dogs align themselves with the earths axis and which way do they usually point?
dogs usually align themselves with the north/south axis and how this is dogs have sensitive chemicals which allows them to sense the earths axis
With which country did Japan align themselves after they withdrew from the League of Nations?
Germany
Why did Mao use propaganda?
Mao used propaganda to promote his ideas, maintain control over the population, and bolster support for the Communist Party. By shaping public opinion through propaganda, Mao could manipulate attitudes and behaviors to align with his vision for Chinese society.
