it is completely circumstantial you can't say that a ninja would kill a samurai every time and vice versa ninja and samurai fought all the time but the ninja wouldn't always win or lose same goes for the samurai
The Liberals were in power in 2009. This answer is for Canada / British Columbia.
Laurier lost the election for many reasons. He lost mainly because of conscription and a wartime act. Conscription forced every male from 19-42 to go to the Great War. Borden passed the Wartime Elections Act. It: a. Gave the vote to women who were wives, sisters or mothers of a soldier. b. Allowed soldiers at the foront to vote The govt decided which riding votes would go to. c. Removed the vote from enemy aliens. The women voted for Borden they wanted their families to survive. The soldier voted for borden they wanted more hel. Their votes were used selectively to win key ridins. The new immigrants lost their votes they were traditional liberal voters. Borden won the election. In the end only 24 000 conscripts went to the front. from: Luca (without a wiki name.)
The defeat of the Spanish Armada caused England to win the war against Spain.
To win.
Steven Harper will win because he is the only one could run Canada
no he wasnt
Yes. Garfield won the Election of 1880.
You need to win an MP election that happens usually every 4-5 years.
In the 2008 election, he did win that state; in the 2012 election, he did not.
I believe that Obama should win, but that's just my opinion. You can think what ever you like but that won't change me AT ALL.
He is the youngest person ever to win a U.S. Presidential Election.
A candidate must win 270 of the 538 votes to win the election.
Western Canadians will tell you that it's the other way around. What are you referring to?
first: win the party nomination second: win the primary election if there is one last: win the general election
Obama!
because republicans didn't put forth every thing the had to win the election