Cases come to the Supreme court in two ways:
Basically, a case can go to the Supreme Court through appeals. Another way a case can make it to the Supreme Court is if it involves changes to the federal law.
Cases are not directly filed with the US Supreme Court. They must begin in the Federal Circuit in one of the US District Courts or in a state trial court.
If a verdict unsatisfactory to one side in the case is rendered, the next step is to appeal that case to the US Federal Court of Appeals for the Federal District in which the District Court was located, or to the court of appeals for the state in which the case was originally tried.
If the verdict is still unsatisfactory, it may be submitted to the US Supreme Court (unless the case originated in the state court system, in which case it must be petitioned to the state supreme court first) which will then decide on whether it wishes to hear the case, or not.
If not - they will remand it back to the Court of Appeals for final jurisdiction. If they DO accept it, they will hear arguments from the attorneys for both sides, and then each Justice will render their own opinion on the case. The majority of opinions decides the case.
Except in extremely rare Constitutional instances cases are not directly filed with the US Supreme Court. They must begin in the Federal Circuit in one of the US District Courts. If a verdict unsatisfactory to one side in the case is rendered, the next step is to appeal that case to the US Federal Court of Appeals for the Federal District in which the District Court was located. If the verdict is still unsatisfactory, it may be submitted to the US Supreme Court which will then decide on whether it wishes to hear the case, or not. If not - they will remand it back to the Court of Appeals for final juisdiction. If they DO accept it, they will hear arguments from the attorneys for both sides, and then each Justice will render their own opinion on the case. The majority of opinions decides the case.
With the exception of cases involving two states, a case arrives at the U.S. Supreme Court by the filing of a petition for appeal from a lower court, which is called a "writ of certiorari" which the court may or may not accept (typically the court only accepts about 1% of the writs filed with it.)
If there is a case involving two states suing each other, the case is filed directly with the Supreme Court and is heard by a special master as a regular court case.
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, which all government officials swear to uphold. Supreme Court decisions are subordinate to constitutional amendments, and represent one of the few ways a Supreme Court decision can be changed.
can purpose amendments to the constitution to overturn a supreme court decision
The US Supreme Court has the authority to overturn a precedent in any case under their review, if they feel the precedent no longer applies to current social and legal circumstances. They can also ignore precedents if they feel a case creates an exception to the rule, for whatever reason.
Many aspects of Western government and the legal system are based on the practices of Ancient Greece. The Law Courts of ancient Athens functioned in ways very similar to the U.S. Supreme Court.
All US Courts, both federal and state, are required to uphold decisions (called binding precedents) of the US Supreme Court under the doctrine of judicial precedent or stare decisis (Latin: let the decision stand) if a question of law has already been settled (res judicata). US Supreme Court decisions are supposed to carry the rule of law, but lower courts sometimes interpret or decide cases in ways that contradict established precedent.Each case is unique, so each court that hears a particular matter may have a different interpretation as to which precedents are controlling and why. If the case is appealed to the US Supreme Court, and the Court grants cert (agrees to review the case under its appellate jurisdiction) and the Supreme Court agrees with the lower court ruling, a new precedent may be set. Otherwise, the Supreme Court may reverse the decision to bring it into compliance with established precedent.The reasoning behind the doctrine of stare decisis is ensuring a fair and consistent application of law to protect Constitutional rights.
There are two ways a case can reach the Supreme Court.The first way is by far the most common: A case is first heard by a trial court. If one of the parties doesn't like the outcome, they appeal. The case is then heard by an appeals court, who has the power to overturn the decision of the trial court. The first appeal is a "gimme" - the appeals court hears everyone's appeal. If one of the parties STILL doesn't like the outcome, they can try to appeal again. The Supreme Court, however, does not have to accept every appeal. To appeal to the Supreme Court, you have to write a "petition for certiorari." If they accept your case, we say that the Supreme Court has "granted cert."The second way is very rare: the Constitution gives the supreme court "original" jurisdiction over a narrow class of cases (mostly cases between states or involving ambassadors.) This means that if a case is of that type, the Supreme Court can take it directly, without any trial court. The court almost never accepts a case this way.
veto
The US Supreme Court had approximately 376 cases on its docket in 1963. Of those, the justices heard arguments in 131 arguments; dismissed 81 cases (most for lack of substantial federal question, some because they'd become moot); and disposed of 164 cases in other ways (mostly by vacating and remanding in light of whatever precedent(s) they believed applied - in 1963, the Supreme Court remanded many cases for a new trial due to their decision in Gideon v. Wainwright).For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The supreme court can't make laws since that is the role of the legislature. Nor can it execute laws.
If your asking in regards to the Supreme Court then: In order for the Supreme Court to see a case there is a lengthy process one must go through. There are three different ways a case can reach the Supreme Court. The least common way is a case that is under the Courts "original jurisdiction", meaning that the Supreme Court hears the case directly. An example of this is when the Court hears arguments between different states, such as the State of New Jersey v State of New York in regards to who has jurisdiction over Ellis Island. Basically it almost never happens but if it does it will most likely be between two different states. If your asking in regards to the Supreme Court then: In order for the Supreme Court to see a case there is a lengthy process one must go through. There are three different ways a case can reach the Supreme Court. The least common way is a case that is under the Courts "original jurisdiction", meaning that the Supreme Court hears the case directly. An example of this is when the Court hears arguments between different states, such as the State of New Jersey v State of New York in regards to who has jurisdiction over Ellis Island. Basically it almost never happens but if it does it will most likely be between two different states. In order for the Supreme Court to see a case there is a lengthy process one must go through. There are three different ways a case can reach the Supreme Court. The least common way is a case that is under the Courts "original jurisdiction", meaning that the Supreme Court hears the case directly. An example of this is when the Court hears arguments between different states, such as the State of New Jersey v State of New York in regards to who has jurisdiction over Ellis Island.
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, which all government officials swear to uphold. Supreme Court decisions are subordinate to constitutional amendments, and represent one of the few ways a Supreme Court decision can be changed.
Circuit splits -- where two of the federal Circuit Courts of Appeal have decided the same issue of law in contradictory ways. Most cases involve US Constitutional issues.
The US Supreme Court received 7,738 petitions for writ of certiorari last Term, of which approximately 30% (3,000) are placed on the "discuss list" and voted on in conference. Approximately 70%, or 5,417, of the cases are "summarily dismissed."The justices eventually select 1.3-1.9%, or 100-150 cases, for adjudication. The Court schedules oral argument for a little more than half of those selected, and disposes of the remaining cases in other ways. Not all cases receive a full opinion.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
amendments, disputes and new laws
Selects judges
can purpose amendments to the constitution to overturn a supreme court decision
There are actually many facts that point to the Parthenon's obvious age over the Supreme Court, but I will name five here.1. The Parthenon was built by the Greeks. This is an obvious one. The Supreme Court wasn't built until 1935.2. The Parthenon has been worn down a bit by time. The Supreme Court? Not so much.3. The Supreme Court was based on the structure of the Parthenon, not the other way around.4. The Parthenon is more open-air, in some ways, than the Supreme Court.5. The Parthenon has Greek statues of gods and goddesses, whereas the Supreme Court does not.