Answer: If there was no government, everyone would go back to the State of Nature before john Locke decided to create a government. People's rights go unprotected, and it is the Governments job to protect peoples Natural Rights. The Government ensue structure, allows equal say and equal representation. Our freedom would crumble, and everyone is going to want to dictate everyone else. Instead of everyone being equal, it is going to be strong vs. weak. State of Nature: The "Natural condition of mankind" is what exists if there is no government, laws and common power to restrain human Nature. State of Nature is, "Every man for himself," which is human beings seeking out to destroy each other in a mad pursuit for power, control and authority.
Hobbes wanted a strong government monarchy.
The philosopher Thomas Hobbes said it, it came from the Leviathan (a book collecting most of his work)
To protect fundamental natural rights of the individuals submitting themselves to the athority of those governing.
Hobbes presented three types of government monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. He argued that monarchy was the best.
He felt that a Unliminted Government was best because, Hobbes wanted absolute power.- Therefore him wanting to be a monarchy.
Hobbes advocated the idea of a strong government which all citizens agreed to obey. Without an agreed upon ruler, according to Hobbes, society would descend into violence and chaos.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
Hobbes wanted a strong government monarchy.
The philosopher Thomas Hobbes said it, it came from the Leviathan (a book collecting most of his work)
Thomas Hobbes for one
Hobbes believed in the concept of a social contract, where individuals give up some of their freedoms to a governing authority in exchange for protection and security. He argued that without this authority, society would be in a constant state of war and chaos. Hobbes also believed in the need for a strong central government to maintain order and prevent conflict.
Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both argued that people are inherently self-interested and need a government to regulate their behavior in order to maintain social order. Hobbes believed that without government, life would be "nasty, brutish, and short," while Rousseau argued that government should represent the general will of the people to ensure social harmony.
To protect fundamental natural rights of the individuals submitting themselves to the athority of those governing.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
Hobbes presented three types of government monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. He argued that monarchy was the best.
Hobbes referred to this concept as the "state of nature," a time when humans lived without a structured society or government, leading to a life that was solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Hobbes believed that in this state, individuals were driven by a "war of all against all" due to the absence of a higher authority to maintain peace and order.
According to Thomas Hobbes, people exchange some of their individual freedoms and rights for protection and security by the government. This exchange forms the basis of the social contract, where individuals agree to follow the laws and authority of the government in exchange for the maintenance of order and protection of their rights.