Answer: If there was no government, everyone would go back to the State of Nature before john Locke decided to create a government. People's rights go unprotected, and it is the Governments job to protect peoples Natural Rights. The Government ensue structure, allows equal say and equal representation. Our freedom would crumble, and everyone is going to want to dictate everyone else. Instead of everyone being equal, it is going to be strong vs. weak. State of Nature: The "Natural condition of mankind" is what exists if there is no government, laws and common power to restrain human Nature. State of Nature is, "Every man for himself," which is human beings seeking out to destroy each other in a mad pursuit for power, control and authority.
Thomas Hobbes argued that without a government (Sovereign Authority) anarchy would ensue. He described this as a 'state of nature'. Hobbes believed that every man's actions would be driven by self interest and not collective negotiation, and during peacetime a man would be constantly at conflict with his neighbours in order to provide for his family.
In his work 'The Leviathan' which describes his theory of social contract he contends that in a lawless society without the protection of the State life would be 'solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short'.
His social contract would mean society would cede their natural rights to their Sovereign Authority which would control civil, military, judicial and powers of the church in return for protection.
Hobbes wanted a strong government monarchy.
The philosopher Thomas Hobbes said it, it came from the Leviathan (a book collecting most of his work)
To protect fundamental natural rights of the individuals submitting themselves to the athority of those governing.
Hobbes presented three types of government monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. He argued that monarchy was the best.
He felt that a Unliminted Government was best because, Hobbes wanted absolute power.- Therefore him wanting to be a monarchy.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
Hobbes advocated the idea of a strong government which all citizens agreed to obey. Without an agreed upon ruler, according to Hobbes, society would descend into violence and chaos.
Hobbes wanted a strong government monarchy.
Thomas Hobbes for one
The philosopher Thomas Hobbes said it, it came from the Leviathan (a book collecting most of his work)
To protect fundamental natural rights of the individuals submitting themselves to the athority of those governing.
Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau both argued that people are inherently self-interested and need a government to regulate their behavior in order to maintain social order. Hobbes believed that without government, life would be "nasty, brutish, and short," while Rousseau argued that government should represent the general will of the people to ensure social harmony.
Hobbes believed in the concept of a social contract, where individuals give up some of their freedoms to a governing authority in exchange for protection and security. He argued that without this authority, society would be in a constant state of war and chaos. Hobbes also believed in the need for a strong central government to maintain order and prevent conflict.
Hobbes believe people exchange many personal freedoms for government protection
Hobbes presented three types of government monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy. He argued that monarchy was the best.
According to Thomas Hobbes, people exchange some of their individual freedoms and rights for protection and security by the government. This exchange forms the basis of the social contract, where individuals agree to follow the laws and authority of the government in exchange for the maintenance of order and protection of their rights.
Hobbes and Locke both agreed that government is necessary to maintain order and protect people's rights. However, they disagreed on the nature of government. Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized government to prevent chaos, while Locke advocated for a limited government with power derived from the consent of the governed.