According to the US Supreme Court in US v. Nixon under what circumstances may the President assert a legally defensible right to Executive Privilege?

Answer 1

United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)

Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote, in the opinion of the Court:

"However, neither the doctrine of separation of powers nor the need for confidentiality of high-level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances. The President's need for complete candor and objectivity from advisers calls for great deference from the courts. However, when the privilege depends solely on the broad, undifferentiated claim of public interest in the confidentiality of such conversations, a confrontation with other values arises. Absent a claim of need to protect military, diplomatic, or sensitive national security secrets, we find it difficult to accept the argument that even the very important interest in confidentiality of Presidential communications is significantly diminished by production of such material for in camera inspection with all the protection that a district court will be obliged to provide."


For more information, see Related Questions, below.