The Three-Fifths Compromise if i'm not mistaken. It counted slaves as 3/5 of a person when determining the amount of representatives a state received in congress (based on population)
As 3/5ths of a person...
Southern states wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population for determining representation in the House of Representatives. They argued that since slaves constituted a significant portion of their population, counting them would increase their political power and influence in Congress. This demand was rooted in the desire to maintain and protect the institution of slavery, as greater representation would help secure their interests. Consequently, the Three-Fifths Compromise was reached, allowing slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for this purpose.
The determination of how slaves would be counted for representation in Congress was largely influenced by the Three-Fifths Compromise during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. This agreement stipulated that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of apportioning representation and taxation. The compromise was a result of negotiations between Northern states, which generally opposed slavery, and Southern states, which sought to maximize their political power by counting enslaved individuals. This arrangement reflected the contentious balance between free and slave states in the emerging United States.
Amendment XIV
the three - fifths compromise is an agreement made at the constitutional convention between northern states , which owned few slaves .and southern states , which owned many slaves . the states agreed that an enslaved person would count as three - fifths of a person in determining representation in congress.
As 3/5ths of a person...
When determining representation by population, slaves were counted as 3/5ths of a person.
The same as every other person.
Under the 3/5ths Compromise, each enslaved person was counted as three fifths of a free person for population reasons. This was especially true when it came to determining taxation and legislative representation for slave holding states.
counted as 3/4 of person
William Blount believed that slaves should be counted as part of the population for the purpose of determining representation in Congress and for the allocation of taxes. He supported the Three-Fifths Compromise, where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
Southern states wanted slaves to be counted as part of the population for determining representation in the House of Representatives. They argued that since slaves constituted a significant portion of their population, counting them would increase their political power and influence in Congress. This demand was rooted in the desire to maintain and protect the institution of slavery, as greater representation would help secure their interests. Consequently, the Three-Fifths Compromise was reached, allowing slaves to be counted as three-fifths of a person for this purpose.
Each slave was counted as 3/5's of a person. Hope this helped you, and good luck
This agreement was made in the original US Constitution, and is generally referred to as "The Great Compromise." The North didn't think that slaves should be counted at all, and the South thought that each slave should be counted as a full person. The reason for the argument was that representation in the house of representatives was based on population and each side wanted to be the majority.
it is a Compromise, which stipulates that three/fifths of the slave population would be counted for purposes of representation.
Oddly, the northerners regarded slaves as property who should receive no representation. Southerners demanded that Blacks be counted with whites.The compromise called the “Three-fifths Compromise” allowed a state to count three fifths of each Black person in determining political representation in the House.
Every slave was counted as three-fifths of a person.