Yes, the statement Bill is nice is true, given those conditions.
One is a bill...and one is not! But...according to some websites, they print different colors.
It is not legally binding
Yes, this is a true statement.
true
It is largely privately owned.
It is valid to conclude that Bill is nice since the first statement indicates that all Mots are nice, and Bill is identified as a Mot in the second statement.
You made a statement that the bills were true, when you knew they were forged.
It is called an "Indictment" or sometimes, "A True Bill."
Yes, it is true that the statement "640k ought to be enough for anybody" was famously attributed to Bill Gates in the early days of computing.
It is called an "Indictment" or sometimes referred to as, "A True Bill."
If the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then "This statement is false" is true, making the statement false. But if the statement is false, then "This statement is false", is a lie, making it "This statement is true." The statement is now true. But if the statement is true, then... It's one of the biggest paradoxes ever, just like saying, "I'm lying right now."
Circular logic would be a statement or series of statements that are true because of another statement, which is true because of the first. For example, statement A is true because statement B is true. Statement B is true because statement A is true
In computing, this is an AND statement.
always true
always true
No, it is not considered slander if the statement is true.
Which statement is not true about characteristics of myths?Which statement is not true about characteristics of myths?