Honey, those delegates have been keeping secrets since before you were born. It's like their own little version of "Keeping Up with the Kardashians," but with more power and less drama. So, do I agree with their rule of secrecy? Sure, why not. Keeps things spicy.
Chat with our AI personalities
The rule of secrecy among delegates can be both beneficial and necessary in certain situations. It allows for open and honest discussions without fear of public scrutiny or pressure. However, transparency is also important in ensuring accountability and maintaining trust among stakeholders. Ultimately, the decision to agree with the rule of secrecy depends on the context and objectives of the delegates' discussions.
Oh, dude, do I agree with the delegates' rule of secrecy? Well, like, technically they're supposed to keep things hush-hush to prevent outside influence and maintain integrity, so yeah, I guess it makes sense. But hey, if they're just using it as an excuse to gossip about each other behind closed doors, then maybe not so much. Just keep it real, you know?
Yes I agree with the delegates' rule of secrecy because what ever ur business decusses in a meeting or plan on what they are going to do they shouldn't tell anyone cause if the word gets out to the wrong person and they might have to switch their whole plan just because it go out to the wrong person
Constitutional delegates adopted a rule of secrecy for two mail reasons. They thought if no notes were taken, they could have a more free and unbiased discussion among themselves. Also, they wanted to prevent the misunderstandings that occur when things are discussed by the public in bits and pieces. They wanted people to see the finished product with fresh eyes.
The Secrecy rule said that the convention had to be held in secret and no outside sources could know what was being debated inside the convention. It helped delegates talk freely without the threat of media attention or possibly losing their political careers due to votes or subject matter they addressed.
Boycotting.
1868
They were planning to propose the replacement of the Articles of confederation with an entirely new basic instrument of government. They held it in secrecy so that nobody could influence the delegates and make it so they can change their minds about things.some were presidents others were delegates