no because the british cant be in another continent or country and be giving them rules that the colonies dont want to folllow. the colonies can make thier own rules. they also cant tax them on what is not useful. and the colonies cant oay taxes for what they dont know
Yes
The British did not at all approve of the way the colonists were fighting. Colonists were using what is known as guerilla tactics. The British believed in open fighting, in lines, on fields. The colonists were attacking from cover, and quickly disappearing. The British found this ungentlemanly.
The British were trying to make the colonists pay taxes to Britain and continue to serve them in ANY capacity. Basically serving the British as if they lived in Britain! The colonists didn't think they should have to live under the rule of Britain without being able to form their own government or setting rules apart from the Mother England. England wanted to keep control of the colonies. Colonists wanted to be separate from England.
Quartering Act
appeal to logic i think not sure tho
Yes
I think you are confused because it was not up to the colonists to protect British rule. It was up to the British forces.
Parliament's denial of voting power to the colonists was a point of contention that ultimately led to the American Revolution. Many colonists believed that they should have representation in the decisions that affected them, as they were being taxed without their consent. This lack of representation was a key factor in the colonists' grievances against British rule. Ultimately, the colonists' belief in the principle of "no taxation without representation" fueled their desire for independence from British rule.
How do you think British colonists evolved from being loyal British citizens to revolutionaries? Why?
They thought it was fair to tax the colonists.
to be free from taxesand to make the king mad and angry.
The British did not at all approve of the way the colonists were fighting. Colonists were using what is known as guerilla tactics. The British believed in open fighting, in lines, on fields. The colonists were attacking from cover, and quickly disappearing. The British found this ungentlemanly.
If you mean England, the colonists hated the new laws because of the taxes the British were dumping on the colonists and how British was trying to control them. the 13 colonies eventually didn't like the british acts so much that they rebeled.
bcaus ethey did
When the soldiers were keeping older they were attacked by colonists and the soldiers defened themselves by firing. So yes it was justified for the brittish. America did not deserve to wage war with Britain...
chimi gana
that they had to pay taxes on tea