answersLogoWhite

0

Kentucky asserted the principle of Nullification: the states had the right to nullify, or consider void. Virginia and Kentucky considered alien and sedition act unconstitutional violations of first amendments.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which of the following proposed a challenge to the constitutional authority of the national governement?

I am 100% positive that the answer is Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. :)


The Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and Virginia Resolutions of 1799 were significant in that they challenged the authority of the federal government and argued in favor of?

states's rights


Why were Kentucky Resolutions of 1798 and Virginia Resolutions of 1799 were significant in that they challenged the authority of the federal government and argued in favor of?

To be able to answer a question we need a who, what, when, where or how. Your question doesn’t provide one of these. It reads as a reference to a previous question or article. You need to do this.


How did the virginia and kentucky resolutions reflect the jeffersonian philosophy of government?

Thomas Jefferson believed strongly that the states should have rights. The Virginia and Kentucky resolutions reflected his view of that.


Why is Alexander Hamilton for Virginia and Kentucky resolutions?

Alexander Hamilton was not in favor of the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions; rather, he opposed them. These resolutions, authored by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, asserted that states could nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, challenging the authority of the federal government. Hamilton believed in a strong central government and argued that the resolutions undermined national unity and the Constitution. He felt that such acts could lead to disunity and chaos among the states, which he sought to prevent.


How did Thomas Jefferson feel about the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions?

The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions reflect Jefferson's view on government because Jefferson wanted he government based on a strict translation of the Constitution. Jefferson's views included that government was instituted to protect individual's rights.


Who supported the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions?

only Kentucky and Virginia supported there own resolutions


The Virginia and Kentucky resolutions were written in response to?

virginia-and-kentucky-resolutions


The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions were?

The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions suggested that states might declare certain acts of Congress unconstitutional. The Kentucky and Virginia resolutions were drafted in 1798 and 1799.


What is the Virginia and Kentucky resoulution?

The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, enacted in 1798 and 1799, were political statements drafted by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, respectively. They were a response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, asserting that states could nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional. The resolutions emphasized the principle of states' rights and the idea that the federal government was a creation of the states, thus allowing states to challenge federal authority. This set a precedent for later debates over states' rights and federal power in the United States.


What rights did the states have according to the Kentucky and Virginia resolutions?

According to the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, the States had power to whatever the Federal Government did not have, as written in the Constitution.Examples: Schools, License plates, Birth Certificates, Death Certificates, ect...


What was the Virginia and Kentucky resolutions?

The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, drafted in 1798 and 1799, were political statements asserting that states had the right to nullify federal laws deemed unconstitutional. They were a response to the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were viewed as overreaching by the federal government. Authored by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, these resolutions emphasized the principles of states' rights and limited federal power, laying the groundwork for future debates over state versus federal authority.