answersLogoWhite

0

it established that states must provide people accused of crimes with access to an attorney

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
More answers

It establish that state must provide people accused of crimes with access to an attorney Apex just took the test 4.4.2 test

User Avatar

emisiak

Lvl 5
3y ago
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What supreme court case incorporated the right to a speedy trial?

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)


What principle was established by the 1963 Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright?

Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.


What was the outcome of the case of Gideon vs Wainwright?

Gideon vs. Wainwright is a US Supreme Court Case from 1963. The vote was unanimous. This court case decided under the fourth amendment, state courts are required to provide an attorney in criminal cases when the defendant cannot afford one.


Prior to the Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, why was Clarence Gideon in jail?

Being refused a lawyer by the state of Florida..... apex... makes no sense to me but its right apparently


How did the US Supreme Court incorporate part of the Bill of Rights to the States in Gideon v. Wainwright 1963?

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark US Supreme Court case that incorporated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal proceedings to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. In this case, the Court ruled emphatically that indigent defendants were entitled to court-appointed lawyers at critical stages of prosecution, including arraignment and trial.An earlier case, Powell v. Alabama, 287 US 45 (1932) had already extended that right to state defendants in capital (death penalty) cases, but the Supreme Court later allowed the states to exercise case-by-case discretion with regard to providing attorneys for other serious criminal offenses in Betts v. Brady, 316 US 455 (1942).For more information, see Related Questions, below.