0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Why do historians consider George Washington a great president?
he made a great consittution and was motivated to his work but he used to cheet
Why do historians not find livy a reliable source of information?
They do find reliable sources. Without that their work is invalid and wrong.
To properly study the human races past all five types of historians be used true or false?
There are more than five types of historians that study the human race. The more historians that look at the challenges and triumphs of the human race, the more insight they can give.
How do scientists and historians differ in their work How are their jobs similar?
Scientists work on different stuff then historians do.
How does his or her perspective affect an historians work?
he or her does something to make the history
What do many historians claim is Plato's most dramatic masterpiece?
Many historians and students of Plato consider Plato's work of Protagoras as his most dramatic piece of work. In it Plato discusses the art of successful living.
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of analyzing historical sources?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Do historians work harder than archaeologists?
Both historians and archaeologists work hard, but they have different methodologies and areas of focus. Historians typically work with written records and documents to interpret past events, while archaeologists study material culture and artifacts to understand past societies. The level of effort required for each profession may vary based on specific projects and research goals.
What do historians do when using the historical thinking skill of evaluating interpretations?
Answer this question… Analyze the work of other historians to draw conclusions
Why does Claudia know about the methods that art historians use to decide the authenticty of a work of art?
she knows all....
Why do historians consider George Washington a great president?
he made a great consittution and was motivated to his work but he used to cheet
Why do historians not find livy a reliable source of information?
They do find reliable sources. Without that their work is invalid and wrong.
Is historian a count noun?
Yes, the noun historian is a count noun. Example:We have two historians that can work on the project.
Why do historians need archaeologists and anthropologists?
Historians need archaeologists to provide physical evidence to support their theories and interpretations about past societies. Anthropologists help historians understand the cultural context of historical events by studying human societies, behaviors, and beliefs. Together, archaeologists and anthropologists provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the past.
